The Importance of Female Mentorship: Tips for Lawyers on the Rise
According to research conducted by the American Bar Association's Commission on Women in the Profession and the Minority Corporate Counsel Association, women lawyers, and especially women of color, are more likely than their male counterparts to be interrupted, to be mistaken for nonlawyers, perform more office housework and to have less access to prime job assignments.
July 01, 2020 at 01:09 PM
5 minute read
For the past 20 years, law schools have seen a roughly equivalent number of men and women enrollment. It was not until 2016 that more women were enrolled than men. However, as is obvious from your first few months as a new attorney, law school is not reality. Women remain a minority in the courtroom and as leaders in practice areas. According to research conducted by the American Bar Association's Commission on Women in the Profession and the Minority Corporate Counsel Association, women lawyers, and especially women of color, are more likely than their male counterparts to be interrupted, to be mistaken for nonlawyers, perform more office housework and to have less access to prime job assignments.
This reality isn't exclusive to attorneys. According to a study conducted by the Harvard Business Review, 65.9% of all interruptions on the U.S. Supreme Court were directed at the three female justices on the bench (Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan).
Thus, the importance of finding a woman sponsor is essential for a young woman's successful legal career. A sponsorship is when a sponsor uses her clout to advocate for a professional's advancement within her organization. While an ordinary mentor relationship provides guidance on practicing in the field, building a book of business, and handling clients, a women sponsorship includes guidance on the unspoken rules of the job such as navigating a field of only men, the correct appearance for the courtroom, and the many other roadblocks that a regular mentor/mentee relationship may lack. A sponsor is key because they not only are a teacher, but an active advocate for the advancement of a young lawyer's career.
|Qualities to Look for in a Sponsor
When seeking a sponsor, consider the following qualities.
- A hands-on teacher. As Benjamin Franklin said, "Tell me and I forget, teach me and I may remember, involve me and I learn." While law school teaches you the substance of the law, a mentor teaches you the practice of the law. The more a sponsor can involve you in their practice, such as a point person for clients, invitations to networking events, and drafting articles, the more you will gain out of the experience. A recent study by UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business found that women actually benefit more from such mentoring than men. A sponsor can expand professional networks by building social skills, providing a guide for the appropriate social skills and providing access to organizations and networks.
- A pathfinder. There is no reason to reinvent the wheel; a good sponsor shows the pathway that you may not have known existed to success as a young lawyer. As a new practitioner, it is always helpful to see the possible pathways for your career from someone who has already been through it. Sponsors are key to helping you get to where you intend to go.
- An objective adviser. What is important for growth is recognizing personal flaws. Recognizing personal flaws is harder to do when it relies on self-evaluation. Sponsors provide that third-party view to tell you areas you can improve. Sponsors also provide advice regarding specific hurdles regarding being a woman in a male dominated field. A part of the realty of this advice for women includes appearance and executive presence. For example, some judges have preferences for whether a woman wears a skirt or pantsuit. Another example is that jurors pay specific attention to women attorney's outfits, and thus women need to consider the importance of the color, make and style of your outfit and how it can detract or add to your case when presenting it to a jury.
- An advocate. Nowadays, mentoring may not be enough. Women need women with clout to help elevate them in the work field by advocating her mentee for the high-stakes assignments that are a prerequisite visibility and a promotion.
In addition, you can be an asset and not a burden to your sponsor. You can be a soundboard, provide points of view, and have respectable discussions and exchanges that can help your sponsor assess projects they are working on, or even work-life hurdles that they experience.
|Finding a Sponsor
The first important step for finding a sponsor takes some self-reflection. It is important to determine your goals and what you would like to gain out of the relationship. The best way to do this is to think about your end goal. What is the type of law career you are looking for? Next, who do you look up to? Whose job would you like to have in the next five, 10 or 15 years? Do you have a role model where you work? Sometimes this person is outside of your practice group.
The best resource for finding a sponsor may be your firm. See if your firm offers mentor/mentee programs or women specific programs. If there is no program, besides encouraging your firm to begin one, seek out opportunities to connect with the potential sponsor you identified. Ask for a call, a meeting, or get involved in the activities that the mentor is involved in.
In order to succeed, young women attorneys need not only an adviser and pathfinder, but a trusted advocate. This way, maybe law school will for once actually reflect a reality and women will be less of a minority in the legal leadership roles.
Ann E. Lemmo is an associate in Clark Hill's banking and financial services group, focusing on consumer financial services regulatory and compliance. She provides consultation, litigation and regulatory advice to financial institutions, law firms and credit reporting agencies. She also provides advice to venture capital firms in the fintech area.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Ease Partner Pay Tensions, Some Law Firms Are Seeking 'Middle Ground' in Transparency
5 minute readDon’t Settle for the Minimum: Finding Constitutional Claims Closer to Home
7 minute readLaw Firm Associates, Staffers Continue to Put a Premium On Workplace Flexibility, Study Finds
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1$7.5M in Punitive Damages Awarded in Product Liability Case
- 2Does My Company Really Need a Generative AI Policy?
- 3'This Is a Watershed Moment': Daniel's Law Overcomes Major Hurdle
- 4Navigating the Storm: Effective Crisis Management (Part 1)
- 5The Testamentary Exception Does Not Permit a Decedent to Impliedly Waive a Survivor’s Attorney-Client Privilege
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250