Plaintiff Was Not Struck by X-Ray Machine, Defense Argued
On June 8, 2016, plaintiff Dorothy Ellerbe, 48, visited her mother in the emergency room at Aria Bucks Hospital, in Langhorne. She claimed that a portable X-ray machine struck her in the back of the neck, causing an injury.
July 16, 2020 at 02:42 PM
4 minute read
Ellerbe v. Aria Health System
Defense Verdict
Date of Verdict: March 11.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 180501208.
Judge: Susan I. Schulman.
Type of Action: Personal injury, workplace negligence.
Injuries: Back, neck, head injuries.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Steven E. Wolfe, Law Offices of Steven E. Wolfe.
Plaintiffs Expert: Nirav K. Shah, neurosurgery; Princeton, New Jersey.
Defense Counsel: Joseph W. Petka, Goldberg Miller & Rubin, Philadelphia.
Comment:
On June 8, 2016, plaintiff Dorothy Ellerbe, 48, visited her mother in the emergency room at Aria Bucks Hospital, in Langhorne. She claimed that a portable X-ray machine struck her in the back of the neck, causing an injury.
Ellerbe sued the hospital and its owner, Aria Health System. Ellerbe faulted the hospital for the negligent conduct of its employee.
According to Ellerbe, she was sitting behind a curtain in the emergency room with her mother when an X-ray technician struck her in the back of her neck with a portable X-ray machine. Ellerbe claimed that the X-ray technician, after striking her, pulled back the curtain and said, "I'm sorry, my fault." Ellerbe's mother testified that the machine struck Ellerbe in the back of the neck. Ellerbe's counsel faulted the hospital employee for failing to exercise proper care and safety.
The X-ray technician who was operating the machine denied striking Ellerbe. The defense questioned the legitimacy of Ellerbe's allegations. Ellerbe initially claimed that she was struck once by the machine, but at her deposition, she claimed, for the first time, that she was struck twice by the machine.
Ellerbe's mother, who was a patient in the bed next to Ellerbe at the time of the incident, was the only witness to corroborate Ellerbe's version of the accident. Although Ellerbe's mother testified that she saw the machine strike her daughter, she stated, in another testimony, that she was asleep at the time of the incident.
Ellerbe's counsel argued that Ellerbe never specified the number of times that she was struck by the machine. Additionally, her mother did not testify that she had been asleep; Ellerbe testified that her mother had been asleep at the time of the incident, Ellerbe's counsel asserted.
Following the alleged June 8, 2016, incident, Ellerbe sought medical attention at the emergency room. She was examined and given pain medication.
Ellerbe was ultimately diagnosed with an aggravation of a pre-existing injury of her cervical spine, post-concussion syndrome and a lumbar strain and sprain. Within days of the alleged incident, she presented to a medical provider and was put on a course of physical therapy. For several months, she treated with exercise and massage. She further treated with a pain management doctor, who administered a series of epidural injections.
Despite extensive conservative treatment, Ellerbe's condition did not improve. Surgery was recommended. In March 2019, she underwent an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at cervical intervertebral discs C4-5, C5-6 and C6-7. Following the surgery, she treated with additional physical therapy.
Ellerbe's neurosurgeon causally related the plaintiff's injuries and treatment to the accident. He opined that Ellerbe requires future treatment, including imaging studies, pain management, physical therapy and adjacent segment surgery at C3-4 and/or C7-T1.
Ellerbe testified that she is limited in her physical activity and is no longer able to go on cruises. She has difficulty performing household duties and is unable to exercise. Ellerbe sought to recover $60,180.73 in past medical costs and $100,000 in future medical costs, plus damages for past and future pain and suffering. Ellerbe's husband sought damages for his claim for loss of consortium.
The defense attributed Ellerbe's complaints and treatment to her pre-existing neck condition. According to the defense, in 2011, Ellerbe was told that she needed a similar surgery on her cervical spine, but she never underwent the surgery.
The jury rendered a defense verdict.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs and defense counsel.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250