Commentary

Workers' Compensation in the New World of the COVID-19 Pandemic

If you contract COVID-19 due to exposure at the workplace, it is imperative that you provide notice to your employer within 120 days of contracting the virus.

July 16, 2020 at 11:47 AM

3 minute read


 

Andrew Ruder of Pond Lehocky Giordano. Andrew Ruder of Pond Lehocky Giordano LLP.

The COVID-19 pandemic has completely changed the way businesses are operating, and workplace safety has become top priority. Unfortunately, due to the sudden, economic disruption, many Americans have been laid off and others have been forced to work from home over the last several months. For the brave workers on the front lines, they continue to potentially expose themselves daily to the virus, which could lead to significant health issues or even death especially for those with underlying medical conditions.

If you contract COVID-19 due to exposure at the workplace, it is imperative that you provide notice to your employer within 120 days of contracting the virus. In certain circumstances, however, individuals may not initially realize that their exposure was work-related because a co-worker or client whom they had close contact with did not immediately disclose that they were infected with the virus. In this situation, the start of the 120-day notice period would not begin until the person knows, or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should know, that the virus was contracted at work.

Similar to orthopedic work injuries, individuals suffering from work-related COVID-19 symptoms are entitled to wage loss benefits if they miss more than one week of work and medical coverage for treatment related to the virus. While some may believe that the entitlement to benefits ends once the person is cured from the virus itself, ongoing issues due to complications related to the virus, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, are also covered under workers' compensation. Additionally, an aggravation or exacerbation of an underlying, preexisting condition caused by COVID-19 is also compensable. In the unfortunate scenario that a spouse or child loses their loved one as a result of work-related COVID-19, they could also be entitled to a weekly benefit paid out on an ongoing basis.

Once the virus began spreading throughout the country, many "nonessential" office buildings have been closed, leaving employees working remotely from home with no end in sight. Naturally, this has resulted in less workplace injuries. However, it is important to remember that an injury occurring during the course and scope of your employment, even while working from home, would be compensable under the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act. For example, you walk out of your home office during working hours to grab a cup of coffee from the kitchen with every intention of drinking the coffee at your desk as you continue to work. However, you never make it back to your desk because you tripped as you were closing your office door and severely injured your knee. There would certainly be an argument to make that the knee injury occurred during the course and scope of employment while working from home; therefore, entitling you to benefits.

Whether you are suffering from work-related COVID-19, ongoing complications that were caused by work-related COVID-19, or an injury that occurred at home while working during the pandemic, it is important to know your rights and the benefits to which you are entitled.

Andrew F. Ruder is an associate with Pond Lehocky Giordano LLP and concentrates his practice in the area of workers' compensation litigation.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Go To Lexis →

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Go To Bloomberg Law →

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

NOT FOR REPRINT

Latest
Trending

Who Got The Work

J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Read More

Law.com Pro

    More from ALM