Workers' Compensation in the New World of the COVID-19 Pandemic
If you contract COVID-19 due to exposure at the workplace, it is imperative that you provide notice to your employer within 120 days of contracting the virus.
July 16, 2020 at 11:47 AM
3 minute read
The COVID-19 pandemic has completely changed the way businesses are operating, and workplace safety has become top priority. Unfortunately, due to the sudden, economic disruption, many Americans have been laid off and others have been forced to work from home over the last several months. For the brave workers on the front lines, they continue to potentially expose themselves daily to the virus, which could lead to significant health issues or even death especially for those with underlying medical conditions.
If you contract COVID-19 due to exposure at the workplace, it is imperative that you provide notice to your employer within 120 days of contracting the virus. In certain circumstances, however, individuals may not initially realize that their exposure was work-related because a co-worker or client whom they had close contact with did not immediately disclose that they were infected with the virus. In this situation, the start of the 120-day notice period would not begin until the person knows, or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should know, that the virus was contracted at work.
Similar to orthopedic work injuries, individuals suffering from work-related COVID-19 symptoms are entitled to wage loss benefits if they miss more than one week of work and medical coverage for treatment related to the virus. While some may believe that the entitlement to benefits ends once the person is cured from the virus itself, ongoing issues due to complications related to the virus, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, are also covered under workers' compensation. Additionally, an aggravation or exacerbation of an underlying, preexisting condition caused by COVID-19 is also compensable. In the unfortunate scenario that a spouse or child loses their loved one as a result of work-related COVID-19, they could also be entitled to a weekly benefit paid out on an ongoing basis.
Once the virus began spreading throughout the country, many "nonessential" office buildings have been closed, leaving employees working remotely from home with no end in sight. Naturally, this has resulted in less workplace injuries. However, it is important to remember that an injury occurring during the course and scope of your employment, even while working from home, would be compensable under the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act. For example, you walk out of your home office during working hours to grab a cup of coffee from the kitchen with every intention of drinking the coffee at your desk as you continue to work. However, you never make it back to your desk because you tripped as you were closing your office door and severely injured your knee. There would certainly be an argument to make that the knee injury occurred during the course and scope of employment while working from home; therefore, entitling you to benefits.
Whether you are suffering from work-related COVID-19, ongoing complications that were caused by work-related COVID-19, or an injury that occurred at home while working during the pandemic, it is important to know your rights and the benefits to which you are entitled.
Andrew F. Ruder is an associate with Pond Lehocky Giordano LLP and concentrates his practice in the area of workers' compensation litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourting Growth, Pennsylvania Law Firms Expanded to Farthest Corners of the Country
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Homegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
- 2'In Re King': One Is Definitely the Loneliest Number When Filing an Involuntary Petition
- 35th Circuit Overturns OFAC’s Tornado Cash Sanctions
- 4The Forgotten Ballot: Expanding Voting Access for Incarcerated Populations
- 5Data Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250