Passing the Bar Exam May Not Be Required for New Pa. Lawyers
The recommendation is to allow a diploma privilege that includes the usual bar admission requirements—except for taking and passing the bar exam. New lawyers would still have to satisfy the character and fitness requirements and other proposed criteria such as completion of the Pennsylvania Bridge the Gap course before admission.
July 30, 2020 at 06:36 PM
3 minute read
The Pennsylvania Bar Association Board of Governors is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and Board of Law Examiners to offer a diploma privilege to certain 2020 law school graduates because of the coronavirus.
Delaying the bar exam and even planning a virtual test to control the spread of the virus have not been enough to allay concerns, according to a report and recommendations from the bar's COVID-19 task force.
The Board of Governors, acting in lieu of the House of Delegates in order to save time, approved the task force recommendations Wednesday.
"The COVID-19 pandemic rages on, with surges occurring throughout the country. By all indications, these surges will continue to occur throughout the fall of 2020," said Michael Jones and Jonathan D. Koltash of the bar's COVID-19 task force.
They noted that Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf issued a new executive order, effective July 16, again restricting the number of people who may gather indoors to a maximum of 25. Also, the city of Philadelphia has restricted gatherings of more than 25 until spring 2021.
"As a result, Pennsylvania law schools and other entities that may have planned to host students for the online exam can no longer do so in a feasible manner," they said. "Not all applicants have reliable internet in their homes and not all applicants have a home situation that allows them to take a three-day exam with adequate uninterrupted concentration. Not having the ability to seek alternative locations—such as at a local law school—disadvantages students who otherwise do not have the means to take the examination at home in optimal conditions. Moreover, even those with ideal home conditions will be at the whim of a storm, accident, or equipment failure that causes a loss of power during the exam."
They also pointed out that public health officials cannot "give any reliable prediction of where Pennsylvania or the country will be in October 2020 as it relates to the pandemic."
The recommendation is to allow a diploma privilege that includes the usual bar admission requirements—except for taking and passing the bar exam. New lawyers would still have to satisfy the character and fitness requirements and other proposed criteria such as completion of the Pennsylvania Bridge the Gap course before admission.
But the move would provide some certainty to the recent law school graduates "who are trying to enter the profession at the most uncertain time in the history of the bar exam," Jones and Koltash said. "It cannot be denied that these are extraordinary times. As recently as February 2020, third-year law students believed they were going to graduate and enter one of the strongest job markets in a decade. Instead, through no fault of their own, they now face perilous conditions. Those unable or unwilling to meet the standards for diploma privilege may still take the October 2020 online exam (or wait for a later exam, whether in person or online)."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. High Court to Weigh Parent Company's Liability for Dissolved Subsidiary's Conduct
3 minute readPa. Supreme Court Taps New Philadelphia Family Division Administrative Judge
3 minute readPeople in the News—Nov. 27, 2024—Flaster Greenberg, Tucker Arensberg
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-68
- 2Friday Newspaper
- 3Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 4Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 5NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250