Novartis Agrees to Pay $678M for Illegal Kickbacks in 'Sham' Speaker Scheme
After nearly a decade of litigation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. (Novartis) has agreed to pay over $678 million in separate settlements to resolve claims that it systematically violated the federal False Claims Act and the Anti-Kickback Statute.
August 03, 2020 at 11:13 AM
6 minute read
After nearly a decade of litigation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. (Novartis) has agreed to pay over $678 million in separate settlements to resolve claims that it systematically violated the federal False Claims Act and the Anti-Kickback Statute after the company spent more than $100 million on lavish meals, fishing junkets, golf outings, wine tastings, sporting events and speaker fees to influence thousands of doctors to prescribe its medicines.
The settlement resolves the lawsuit captioned Bilotta v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals, No. 1:11-cv-0071-PCG (S.D.N.Y.) initially filed in 2011 by a former Novartis sales representative under the private whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, which permits private parties to file suit on behalf of the United States for false claims and share in a portion of the government's recovery. The U.S. government joined the civil suit in 2013.
According to Oswald Bilotta, the former Novartis sales representative who filed the initial lawsuit, Novartis sales representatives hosted tens of thousands of speaker programs and "roundtables" between 2002 and 2011, purportedly to share medical information about the company's products. But at many of these events, often held at high-end restaurants, country clubs and even strip clubs, the focus was on providing doctors with cash payments in the form of bogus speaking honoraria and other perks to induce them to prescribe its cardiovascular and diabetes drugs.
Sometimes, there was no event at all; just a speaking fee from Novartis to a doctor for a medical presentation that was never given with the intent to induce doctors to write more Novartis prescriptions or run the risk of being dropped from the "speaker program."
On behalf of the government and to prove his case, Bilotta secretly recorded himself making cash payments to two doctors and got confirmation from four others of having accepted prior remuneration.
Prosecutors found that five Pennsylvania doctors were paid for speaking at a total of 100 events in only five years. The physicians took turns being the purported speaker, receiving $1,000 in speaking fees each time. Meanwhile, in an unidentified location, a single doctor who prescribed Novartis drugs 8,000 times allegedly received $320,000 in fees for dubious engagements.
The U.S. government alleged that these "sham" educational events constituted illegal kickbacks, which led to fraudulent prescription claims paid by Medicare, Medicaid and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
"For more than a decade, Novartis spent hundreds of millions of dollars on so-called speaker programs, including speaking fees, exorbitant meals and top-shelf alcohol that were nothing more than bribes to get doctors across the country to prescribe Novartis's drugs," said Audrey Strauss, the acting Manhattan U.S. Attorney, in a statement announcing the settlement. "Giving these cash payments and other lavish goodies interferes with the duty of doctors to choose the best treatment for their patients and increases drug costs for everyone."
According to the complaint, physicians who participated in the alleged sham speaker programs wrote prescriptions for several drugs, including Lotrel, Diovan, Tekturna, Exforge, Valturna, Tekamlo and Starlix, that were filled at pharmacies across the country. After filling and dispensing the prescriptions, the pharmacies then submitted claims for reimbursement to Medicare and other government-funded health care programs.
The pharmacies' claims resulted in payments by the government for prescriptions that were allegedly induced through fraud, i.e., Novartis' alleged illegal payments to physicians who wrote the prescriptions. Since Novartis' actions allegedly caused the submission of false claims to the government via the dispensing pharmacies, those actions were alleged to constitute violations of the False Claims Act and the Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. Section 1320a-7b, which criminalizes, among other things, "knowingly or willingly" offering or paying a person "remuneration," in the form of kickbacks, bribes, or rebates, to "induce" that person to "recommend" the purchase of a drug covered by a "federal health care program."
The case settled on the eve of trial and resulted in the negotiation of an agreement requiring Novartis to engage in a number of important changes in practice with respect to its speaker programs. For example, under the terms of a corporate integrity agreement entered into with the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, all Novartis speaking events must be conducted virtually, and the amount of money Novartis can pay doctors for making presentations has been limited.
Novartis also made extensive admissions in the settlement, acknowledging its sales representatives knowingly made payments to induce doctors to prescribe more.
Of the $678 million, Novartis will pay $591 million to the United States as False Claims Act damages, $38.4 million will be forfeited to the United States as proceeds for violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, and the remaining $48 million will go to various states to resolve Medicaid claims.
The settlement comes less than a week after the pharmaceutical company agreed to pay nearly $347 million to the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission over charges that it bribed doctors and state-owned hospitals in Greece, Vietnam and South Korea to prescribe its products and created false records to cover the bribes.
In addition to settling the kickback allegations, Novartis agreed to pay $51 million to resolve claims by prosecutors in Boston that it violated federal law by paying the Medicare copays for its own drugs to get patients covered by federal insurance programs to buy their drugs. In the Boston settlement, Novartis acknowledged using three charitable foundations to pay Medicare patients' co-pays in violation of federal anti-kickback statutes between 2010 and 2014.
Vasilios (Bill) J. Kalogredis, is the chairman of Lamb McErlane's health law department. He represents many medical and dental groups and thousands of individual physicians and dentists. He can be reached at [email protected].
Rachel E. Lusk Klebanoff is a senior associate at the firm who focuses on health law and health care litigation. She represents physicians, dentists, group practices, and other health-related entities in transactional, regulatory and compliance matters. She can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250