A simmering controversy over the seemingly arcane issue of multiple appeal numbers on notices of appeal in related appeals boiled over recently, spawning three Superior Court en banc decisions, and a concurrent appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. The net result, at least for now, is the that the appellate trap for the unwary created in Commonwealth v. Creese, 216 A.3d 1142 (Pa. Super. 2019), essentially no longer exists. The former Creese rule—that inclusion of more than one appellate docket number on any notice of appeal, even where separate notices are filed, is a fatal defect requiring that the appeal be quashed—is overruled. However, everything is subject to a pending appeal in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.