What Is Keeping In-House Counsel Up at Night About Trade Secrets?
Especially early in the COVID-19 pandemic, it seemed like not a week went by when another article (or several) appeared, including by me, giving advice to companies on how to better protect their trade secrets especially with exponentially increased remote work, among other things. To be sure, there are increased risks to trade secrets resulting from the pandemic.
October 20, 2020 at 01:45 PM
9 minute read
Especially early in the COVID-19 pandemic, it seemed like not a week went by when another article (or several) appeared, including by me, giving advice to companies on how to better protect their trade secrets especially with exponentially increased remote work, among other things. To be sure, there are increased risks to trade secrets resulting from the pandemic. But as savvy in-house counsel know, all companies need a comprehensive trade secrets management program even aside from the pandemic. So what should companies be worried about when it comes to trade secrets? I recently had the opportunity to speak with in-house counsel from the bio-tech, pharmaceutical and materials industries to discuss the top concerns that keep them up at night when it comes to trade secrets, both before and now in light of COVID-19. Here are some of the takeaways that I learned from these discussions.
First and foremost, the in-house counsel I spoke with worry about "insider" risk. Their definition of an "insider" is broad and includes not only employees but also contractors and other business partners, such as vendors and customers. These are the people who often have access to company trade secrets on a day in day out basis. What are the key concerns or risks? Well, naturally in-house counsel are concerned about risk of deliberate or inadvertent loss—ranging from an employee taking trade secrets to a competitor and using them there to an employee losing a laptop containing critical information that was not password protected or encrypted. But of equal concern is trade secrets contamination or infiltration. For example, some are concerned about having files or documents containing company trade secrets destroyed or altered. Others are concerned about having a company's trade secrets becoming comingled with a third-party's. The later scenario can happen often in industries with a lot of employee mobility among competitors. Similarly, with business partners, concerns include use of trade secrets beyond the scope of permitted uses or continued use after a business relationship ends. Indeed, you also need to think about the business partners' employees—how good a job are the business partners doing internally in protecting their own trade secrets, let alone yours?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
- 2Lackawanna County Lawyer Fails to Shake Legal Mal Claims Over Sex With Client
- 3Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie
- 4HSF Accounts Show US Operating Losses Last Year But Revenue Increased Slightly
- 5Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250