Commentary

Right to Fair Representation Transcends Personal Animus

We're not here to opine on the merits of those challenges as none of us are wearing a black robe (though some of us hope to one day). Rather, we write to address what we consider a dangerous trend developing as a result of these legal challenges regardless of your politics.

November 18, 2020 at 04:35 PM

6 minute read


Shutterstock image Shutterstock image

If the last four years have shown us anything, it's that Donald Trump is a polarizing figure. He's furthered that reputation with his efforts to contest the results of the 2020 presidential election. Trump and his campaign have filed a series of lawsuits in several states, including here in Pennsylvania, challenging the constitutionality of the election process. We're not here to opine on the merits of those challenges as none of us are wearing a black robe (though some of us hope to one day). Rather, we write to address what we consider a dangerous trend developing as a result of these legal challenges regardless of your politics.

Recent reports have documented significant pressures on law firms representing Trump and his campaign. Last week the New York Times detailed concern among lawyers at Jones Day, one of the firms that filed suit on behalf of the Trump campaign, that the firm's representation of Trump is "advancing arguments that lack evidence and may be helping Mr. Trump and his allies undermine the integrity of American elections …" The same article described a similar state of unrest at Porter Wright, another firm representing the Trump campaign, that resulted in one attorney quitting in response to the firm's agreement to represent Trump in Pennsylvania. Porter Wright has since formerly withdrawn from representing the Trump campaign, that many presume to be the result of intensifying public pressure and rumored internal conflict.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Go To Lexis →

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Go To Bloomberg Law →

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

NOT FOR REPRINT

Latest
Trending

Who Got The Work

J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Read More

Law.com Pro