Another Obstacle for Immigrants With Citizenship Test Changes
On Dec. 1, the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) implemented changes to the naturalization test that include more questions, as well as changes to existing questions, making the test more difficult to prepare for and pass.
December 18, 2020 at 12:47 PM
6 minute read
On Dec. 1, the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) implemented changes to the naturalization test that include more questions, as well as changes to existing questions, making the test more difficult to prepare for and pass. The changes will be particularly difficult for immigrants without a higher level of English language proficiency.
For background, to become a naturalized U.S. citizen, a legal permanent resident (also known as a green card holder) is required to pass a naturalization test administered by a USCIS officer during an in-person interview. The test, which was most recently revised in 2008, is composed of two parts—an English language test and a civics test. The English language component remains unchanged and requires an applicant to demonstrate the ability to read, write and speak basic English. The USCIS officer evaluates English-speaking proficiency through the interview conversation, but also requires the applicant to read aloud and write one of three sentences. This tests the applicant's reading and writing abilities. Legal permanent residents over 50 years old who have resided in the United States for 20 years, or those 55 or older and in the United States for 15 years, are exempt from the English test and may take the civics exam in their native language. Special considerations are also given to applicants who are 65 years or older and have been permanent residents for at least 20 years.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
5 minute readThe Intersection of Labor Law and Politics Following the Presidential Election
8 minute readSuperior Court Directs Western Pa. Judge to Recuse From Case Over Business Ties to Defendant
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 2'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 3Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
- 4After DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 5People in the News—Jan. 23, 2025—Marshall Dennehey, Duane Morris, Hangley Aronchick
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.