Facts or Philosophy: Which Should Drive Court Decisions?
In the now much celebrated and talked about decision of Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, 2020 U.S. LEXIS 5708, the facts seem to be more important than acknowledged by all of the self-made commentators rushing to judgment.
January 14, 2021 at 11:34 AM
7 minute read
Lawyers are fond of saying "bad facts make for bad law." Presumably, therefore, good facts should make for good law. Putting aside the humble, tired cliché phrases, every experienced lawyer knows that ultimately philosophical prerogative is driven by factual underpinnings. At the very least, we should approach our cases as though the facts matter.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5First Lawsuit Filed Alleging Contraceptive Depo-Provera Caused Brain Tumor
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250