Smith & Wesson .40-cal M&P pistol with magazines and ammunition. Photo: Shutterstock
One of the first lessons of any civics class is that a judge’s role is to interpret the law. But that can be a difficult task when the law at issue has “significant gaps” in it.
That’s the dilemma a Pennsylvania judge faced when determining whether the Montgomery County sheriff properly considered a man’s application for a license to carry firearms after the man’s license had previously been revoked.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
