Short-Term Borrowing for Local Governments, School Districts in COVID Uncertainty
Recent legislation passed by the Pennsylvania General Assembly offers a new short short-term borrowing option to local governments and school districts dealing with budget uncertainties related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
February 04, 2021 at 11:29 AM
5 minute read
Recent legislation passed by the Pennsylvania General Assembly offers a new short short-term borrowing option to local governments and school districts dealing with budget uncertainties related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. House Bill 2536 was signed into law by Gov. Tom Wolf Nov. 23, 2020, as Act 114 of 2020. Among other things, Act 114 created a special, limited emergency tax and revenue anticipation note program for the 2021 calendar year. The new program will provide greater financial flexibility to local governments and school districts as they await the results of tax collections in the coming months.
In general, the ability of a county, municipality or school district (referred to herein as a "local government unit") to issue tax and revenue anticipation notes, or TRANs as they are commonly called, is governed by the Local Government Unit Debt Act, Act 177 of 1996 (S.B. 689), 53 Pa.C.S. Section 8001 et seq. (the Debt Act). Under the Debt Act, TRANs are defined as "notes issued in anticipation of taxes, in anticipation of revenues or in anticipation of both as designated in the notes." The Debt Act prescribes a number of limitations on the ability of a local government unit to issue a TRAN, including the following requirements which are of particular interest:
- The total amount of TRANs issued in a fiscal year cannot exceed 85% of the amount of taxes levied and revenues budgeted to be received by the local government unit for that fiscal year.
- The local government unit must certify to the commonwealth as to the estimated amount of taxes and revenues anticipated to be received in the current fiscal year. This estimate must be based on collection experience and current economic conditions of the local government unit, i.e., it must take into account the current economic climate, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- The final maturity date of a TRAN may not extend beyond the last day of the fiscal year in which the TRAN is issued. In the event the TRAN is not repaid at maturity, the unpaid balance is treated as non-electoral debt under the Debt Act, and the local government unit must include the repayment of it in its budget for the ensuing fiscal year.
In the current economic climate, where there is ongoing uncertainty as to tax collection and revenue results, the issuance of a TRAN prior to the passage of Act 114 was a bit of a gamble. A local government unit considering issuing a TRAN had to be confident that it would collect enough taxes and other revenues before the end of the fiscal year (for school districts, June 30, and for counties and other municipalities, Dec. 31, 2021) to repay the TRAN. For certain local government units affected by the pandemic, the uncertainty might be so great that they would be unable to deliver the required certification to the commonwealth under the Debt Act.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSuperior Court Directs Western Pa. Judge to Recuse From Case Over Business Ties to Defendant
3 minute readNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250