The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether a hospital facing a personal injury claim will need to answer questions about when it learned that one of its patients, who later went on to assault another patient, was a sex offender.

The justices on Wednesday granted allocatur in the case, captioned Pasquini v. Fairmount Behavioral Health Systems, to determine whether that information is discoverable, or if it must be kept confidential under the Mental Health Procedures Act. Specifically, the justices agreed to take up the question, “Is a provider’s knowledge of a patient’s status as a registered sex offender, which may have been obtained from therapeutic communication with the patient, confidential under the MHPA and privileged pursuant to the psychiatrist/psychologist privilege?”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]