The Pennsylvania Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a medical malpractice case that provides the justices an opportunity to clarify key aspects of a 2018 decision in which the high court limited the scope of the Peer Review Protection Act.

Argument in Leadbitter v. Keystone Anesthesia Consultants follows the Superior Court order requiring defendant St. Clair Hospital to produce to the plaintiffs the unredacted credentialing file of defendant Dr. Carmen Petraglia.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]