Likely Future Legal Trends in a Post-Pandemic World
Of course, the pandemic brought about many changes to the way we live and work. Some changes are likely short term. Others will potentially last longer. Law firms and in-house legal departments are increasingly evaluating what the post-pandemic workplace will look like for their teams.
March 18, 2021 at 01:40 PM
6 minute read
As we move into the second quarter of 2021, the world is slowly emerging from the pandemic. Of course, the pandemic brought about many changes to the way we live and work. Some changes are likely short term. Others will potentially last longer. Law firms and in-house legal departments are increasingly evaluating what the post-pandemic workplace will look like for their teams. Below are predictions about five pandemic-era legal developments that are likely here to stay.
- The Use of Digital Collaboration Tools Will Continue and Grow
Communication and collaboration are at the core of legal practice. Beginning in 2020, many law firms embraced video meeting apps and other digital collaboration tools, such as web-based applications, that allow teams to share documents and information through online portals. In addition to the use of video meeting apps, many law firms and legal departments have also explored team chat apps as part of their remote work ecosystem. In addition to these more traditional collaboration tools, emerging virtual collaboration tech continues to be developed and can assist law firms and legal departments striving to maintain cohesive culture and engagement.
The use of digital collaboration tech is likely to continue even when and if lawyers return to the physical workplace. Indeed, it is likely that law firms and legal departments will continue to explore emerging technology in this space. One example of this emerging tech is the development of "virtual worlds" for work. A virtual world involves a computer-generated, shared online virtual environment. Users of virtual worlds typically interact with each other through avatars, or digital personal representations. Avatars often mimic a user's physical appearance. Users speak with one another using microphones (or phone lines), send messages through the virtual platform, and share documents with one another. The virtual environment can be modeled off of a physical office—each user can have his or her own desk, cubicle, or office, and can "drop in" to chat with other users spontaneously as well as collaborate in scheduled meetings. Often, in a virtual world, the users have a mechanism to note if they are "available" for chatting with other users and, through the users' avatars, the team members can bump into one another to talk by the virtual water cooler. Depending on the technology used, virtual worlds can feel to a user as if they were in a video game-like environment. Expect the use of this kind of tech, as well as more traditional digital collaboration tools, to continue into the future.
- Legal Automation Will Accelerate
Cost containment and predictability were prized in 2020. One area where value and return on investment was realized during the pandemic was through artificial intelligence-enabled content generation and other AI-based tools. These tools have been available on the marketplace for years, but more solidly transitioned from the "hype cycle" to the adoption phase due to the necessities of the pandemic.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSuperior Court Directs Western Pa. Judge to Recuse From Case Over Business Ties to Defendant
3 minute readNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250