The Pennsylvania Senate and many in the family law community have been engaged in a heated debate for months on proposed child custody legislation known as “Kayden’s Law.” At stake is how to make the courts more responsive to the needs of children and more sensitive to the traumatic familial experiences that children may suffer.

What’s wrong with custody courts? Plenty. Dockets are overloaded and cases delayed, often by years. Few counties have mechanisms to conduct thorough, neutral custody evaluations, so unless the parties can pay for these expensive studies, the courts are left to the narratives presented by the litigants. With no right to court-appointed counsel, thousands of parents appear pro se. Reforms are needed, but Kayden’s Law will over-correct a system because of a singular, horrible case.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]