![Andrew J. Zeltner of Klasko Immigration Law Partners. Courtesy photo](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2020/10/Andrew-Zeltner-Article-202010081044.jpg)
Nonimmigrant Visa Ban Expires: Has International Travel Turned the COVID Corner?
Despite the end of the visa ban, substantial headwinds still exist for those needing to travel internationally.
April 14, 2021 at 10:41 AM
5 minute read
After much speculation, the Biden administration has opted to allow former President Donald Trump's nonimmigrant visa ban to expire on March 31. The ban was originally issued in an executive order in June 2020 and primarily affected the ability of those in H-1B, L-1 or J-1 status to obtain a visa at a U.S embassy abroad. While the Trump administration's initial goal of reducing legal immigration by at least 50% was stymied in Congress, the COVID-19 pandemic provided the administration with the pretext needed to enact its visa ban. In the waning days of his administration, Trump extended the ban until the end of March 2021 (it was set to expire in December 2020) and its end represents some restored hope for the global talent that is integral to restoring the fabric of our economy.
Despite the end of the visa ban, substantial headwinds still exist for those needing to travel internationally. Just as the pandemic is constantly changing, the still-applicable travel bans, quarantine, and COVID testing requirements are mind-numbingly complex and remain highly fluid. It is important to underscore that despite the end of the visa ban, President Joe Biden has continued the applicable country travel bans that affect individuals located in the Schengen Area, U.K., Ireland, China, Brazil, South Africa and Iran, pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 10043. These individuals are unable to travel without obtaining a national interest exception (NIE) from a U.S. embassy abroad. In addition, most U.S. embassies still have limited operations and have a limited staff. As such, visa appointments at many consulates are not available until later this fall and some delays persist until early 2022.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business? Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/c6/09/887e18ff42bda2b42ebaaf3e0681/immigration-ice-detention-3-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute read![Takeaways From Day One of Pam Bondi’s Confirmation Hearing Takeaways From Day One of Pam Bondi’s Confirmation Hearing](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/c5/06/96bf966240e792d49fbb089561e4/pamela-bondi-2-767x633.jpg)
![Facing the Civil Fraud Penalty? Here’s What You Need to Know Facing the Civil Fraud Penalty? Here’s What You Need to Know](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailyreportonline/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2024/09/Jerrika-Anderson-767x633.jpg)
![3rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers 3rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/403/2024/03/Starbucks-Sign-767x633.jpg)
3rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
Trending Stories
- 1DC Circuit Keeps Docs in Judge Newman's Misconduct Proceedings Sealed
- 2Litigators of the Week: US Soccer and MLS Fend Off Claims They Conspired to Scuttle Rival League’s Prospect
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers and Clients Left 'Relying on the Governments to Sort This Out'
- 5Willkie Adds Five-Lawyer Team From Quinn Emanuel in Germany
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250