Closed due to coronavirus sign on the door of a gym. Photo: Neptunestock/Shutterstock Two Pa. Courts, Two Opposite Rulings in Similar COVID Business Insurance Cases
A downtown Pittsburgh tavern should be covered by its insurer for pandemic-related business losses, says one judge. A Lawrence County sporting goods store with the same claim should not, says another. These disparate rulings on the same subject, reached by judges in Allegheny and Lawrence counties, show that when it comes to business insurance coverage during the COVID-19 pandemic, the devil is in the details of the policy.
May 27, 2021 at 06:00 PM
3 minute read
Insurance Law
A downtown Pittsburgh tavern should be covered by its insurer for pandemic-related business losses, says one judge. A Lawrence County sporting goods store with the same claim should not, says another.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
