![Photo: Shutterstock](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2021/07/Attorney-Client-Privilege-01-767x633.jpg)
Siding With Cozen, Court Says Self-Defense Exception to Professional Conduct Rules Can Outweigh Privilege
In an apparent issue of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled in a Dragonetti Act lawsuit against Cozen O'Connor that the state's attorney conduct rules permit lawyers to disclose otherwise privileged documents into discovery in their own defense.
July 02, 2021 at 04:31 PM
3 minute read
Pennsylvania Law Weekly NewsIn an apparent issue of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled in a Dragonetti Act lawsuit against Cozen O'Connor that the state's attorney conduct rules permit lawyers to disclose otherwise privileged documents into discovery in their own defense.
A three-judge panel consisting of Judges Deborah Kunselman, Megan McCarthy King and Daniel Pellegrini held in the Montgomery County case of Perelman v. Perelman that Pa.R.P.C. 1.6(c)(4) allows attorneys to disclose information normally protected under the work product or attorney-client privilege.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Pa. High Court to Decide Whether Flight in a High Crime Area Can Result in an Investigative Stop Pa. High Court to Decide Whether Flight in a High Crime Area Can Result in an Investigative Stop](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2021/06/Mangino_Matthew-767x633.jpg)
Pa. High Court to Decide Whether Flight in a High Crime Area Can Result in an Investigative Stop
6 minute read![Lackawanna County Lawyer Fails to Shake Legal Mal Claims Over Sex With Client Lackawanna County Lawyer Fails to Shake Legal Mal Claims Over Sex With Client](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/09/Lackawanna-County-Courthouse-767x633-4.jpg)
Lackawanna County Lawyer Fails to Shake Legal Mal Claims Over Sex With Client
3 minute read![Pa. Superior Court Rules Pizza Chain Liable for Franchisee Driver's Crash Pa. Superior Court Rules Pizza Chain Liable for Franchisee Driver's Crash](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/23/32/48b6e7ed401f93d28fc3749c6e06/dominos-pizza-restaurant-06-767x633.jpg)
Pa. Superior Court Rules Pizza Chain Liable for Franchisee Driver's Crash
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Selendy Gay Files Lawsuit Challenging Trump's Workforce Reclassification EO
- 2Trump's DOJ Withdraws Opposition to Law Banning Trans Care for Minors
- 3Perkins Coie Backs Challenge to Trump's Ban on Transgender Military Service
- 4New Charges Expected in Sex Trafficking Case Against Broker Brothers
- 5With AI, What Changes Can Midsize Firms Expect?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250