Navigating the Nuances and Unique Issues of a Gray Divorce
A gray divorce is often not a simple divorce, as it requires the unwinding and division of a marital estate built over many years.
July 05, 2021 at 10:42 AM
7 minute read
The divorce of Bill and Melinda Gates made headlines recently, not only because of the size of the marital estate, but also because they were married so long. Many people were astounded that after 27 years of marriage, a couple, such as the Gates, who seemingly had it all, would divorce. What is even more surprising is that it is becoming increasingly common for people to divorce after many years of being married, raising children, and readying themselves for their golden years. This situation even has a name—it is known as a "gray divorce." Couples who divorce after a long-term marriage, typically when they are over the age of 50, fall into the category of a "gray divorce." For many, after their children have grown and moved from the family home, the couple is left behind to re-evaluate their relationship and, particularly, with whom they wish to spend the rest of their lives. No longer consumed by raising children and child-related activities, or climbing the corporate ladder and establishing successful careers, many couples come to the realization that they would rather live the remainder of their lives separately than remain together. While the overall divorce rate has been dropping, the number of divorces for people over age 50 is surging. The recent global pandemic has only increased the number of couples over age 50 reconsidering their future and the state of their marriage.
A gray divorce is often not a simple divorce, as it requires the unwinding and division of a marital estate built over many years. There are often many assets to value and complex issues to tackle. Since many couples are starting to think of retirement at this stage of life rather than building their careers, the division of assets takes on an even greater importance because there is less time to recoup assets that are lost in a divorce. In some instances, the parties are already retired. Pensions and other retirement assets may be in pay status and thus a division of same may be more complicated than by simply utilizing a qualified domestic relations order. Selling a marital home may make sense for both parties, neither of whom, may want to be saddled with the expense and upkeep of maintaining a home with more space than needed. However, disposing of a vacation home that was contemplated as a retirement home or a place for extended family to gather and enjoy becomes more emotional and difficult. Those who are still employed may be reaping greater benefits, bonuses, perquisites and income as a result of achieving their greatest career potential. This also results in more assets to consider, value, divide and dispute in a divorce.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSuperior Court Directs Western Pa. Judge to Recuse From Case Over Business Ties to Defendant
3 minute readNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250