Recently, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court delved into the age-old question of whether an injured worker should be considered an employee, thereby being eligible for workers' compensation insurance, or an independent contractor, which renders the worker indelible for such protections. As is well known, under Sections 103 and 104 of the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act, an independent contractor is not entitled to benefits due to the absence of a master/servant relationship. The employee/independent contractor relationship issue has become much more clear in Pennsylvania in the construction setting with the passage in 2011 of the Construction Workplace Misclassification Act (Act 72), which made it illegal for an employer to misclassify employees as independent contractors for all commercial and residential construction in Pennsylvania. It also set forth a very specific test for determining the appropriate classification, most of which was derived from existing case law. However, outside of the construction setting, the inexact web of common law still controls the master/servant relationship issue.