Plaintiffs attorneys who are suing Amazon.com Inc. over alleged lost wages at 11 Connecticut fulfillment centers believe a recent ruling in front of Pennsylvania’s high court could bode well for their case.

“What happened in Pennsylvania can only benefit us,” co-plaintiffs counsel Thomas Durkin of Hayber, McKenna & Dinsmore in Hartford said. “This is an important case because it’s a lawsuit, like many others, to recover wages for time that employers require employees to remain on their premises for the benefit of the employer.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]