Judge Stephanos Bibas of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
A Chinese national who was beaten to the point of disability and whose wife was forced to have an abortion by authorities in his homeland should not have been denied asylum by an immigration court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled.
In the court’s Oct. 12 opinion, Third Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas criticized the Board of Immigration Appeals’ analysis of Cha Liang’s persecution in China by not looking at it in its totally when deciding whether he should remain in this country.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
