Pa. County Botches Spanish-Language Ballot Instructions
Berks County mailed erroneous Spanish-language instructions that said the ballots had to be returned by Nov. 18—16 days past the actual deadline of 8 p.m. on Election Day.
November 01, 2021 at 01:00 PM
3 minute read
Some Spanish-speaking voters in a Pennsylvania city where Hispanics account for nearly 70% of the population are at risk of being disenfranchised in this week's general election because of an error in Spanish-language instructions that accompanied 17,000 mail-in ballots, activists and elected officials said Oct. 28.
Berks County mailed erroneous Spanish-language instructions that said the ballots had to be returned by Nov. 18—16 days past the actual deadline of 8 p.m. on Election Day. Voters who got the botched instructions include those in Reading, population 95,000, a growing city in southeastern Pennsylvania with the state's highest percentage of Latino people.
The incorrect date did not appear on the ballot itself, and Berks County sent a follow-up letter to the affected voters and enlisted Hispanic groups to do outreach. But people rallying outside the Berks County Courthouse on Oct. 28 demanded that county officials do more.
"The harm has already been done," said Patty Torres, organizing director for Make the Road Pennsylvania, an advocacy group for immigrants and working-class Latinos. Torres decried what she called "voter misinformation" from Berks County and said any voter who received the incorrect instructions should be permitted to return their mail-in ballot until Nov. 18 and still have it counted.
That suggestion was rejected by county officials, who said they had no legal authority to extend the deadline. The Pennsylvania Department of State, which oversees elections, agreed, saying such an extension would have to be ordered by a court.
Torres also asked the county to retain any ballots received between Nov. 2 and Nov. 18 "so an investigation can take place into whether the ballots were returned according to the erroneous instructions sent by the county, in which case they should be honored."
County officials said that they do not know many Spanish-speaking voters received the botched instructions, since voters get instructions in both English and Spanish, but that about 2,800 of the ballots went to voters in precincts federally designated as bilingual.
County officials said the error happened when Spanish-language mail-in ballot instructions that were used in the May 18 primary were updated for the November general election. A worker switched the month from May to November, but neglected to change the date of the deadline, the county said.
Meeting Oct. 28, the Berks County Board of Commissioners took action to strengthen the procedure for having Spanish-language voting materials reviewed for accuracy.
All three members of the board—two Republicans and one Democrat—rejected suggestions made by activists and others that the flawed ballot instructions represented a deliberate attempt to suppress Latino votes.
"This is not a partisan issue. It was an honest mistake and we take responsibility," GOP Commissioner Christian Leinbach said at the meeting.
Those rallying outside the Berks County Courthouse cast the error as just the latest in a series of obstacles to voting faced by the area's fast-growing Latino population, including hourslong waits to vote in last year's presidential election. They pointed out that the U.S. Department of Justice sued Berks County as far back as 2003 over its failure to provide language accommodations for Spanish-speaking voters.
"When is enough enough?" said state Rep. Manuel Guzman Jr., D-Reading. "How many mistakes need to happen before somebody is held accountable?"
The ballot for Tuesday's election includes statewide judicial races, as well as local races for city and county offices and the school board.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHigh Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA
4 minute readJudges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readDispute Over Failure to Accommodate Disability Ends in $900K Settlement
3 minute readPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
Trending Stories
- 1Patent Pending ... and Pending ... and Pending? Brace Yourself for Longer Waits
- 2Indian Law Firm Cyril Amarchand Rolls Out AI Strategy, Adopts Suite of AI Tools
- 3Which Legal Tech Jobs Are on the Rise, and Which Aren't, with Jared Coseglia
- 4Absent Explicit Agreement, Court Rejects Unilateral Responsiveness Redaction of Text Messages
- 5SEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250