Sid Steinberg of Fisher Broyles Recent Decision: New Boss Means New Expectations
The recent decision of Cameron-Satchell v. CDHA Management, No. 21-576, 2021 U.S. Dist LEXIS 202877 (Oct. 21, 2021) (Kearney, J.) begins with an observation that could define many employment discrimination cases: "an at-will employee meeting one boss' expectations must understand a new boss may not be satisfied with the same old performance."
November 02, 2021 at 01:22 PM
5 minute read
The recent decision of Cameron-Satchell v. CDHA Management, No. 21-576, 2021 U.S. Dist LEXIS 202877 (Oct. 21, 2021) (Kearney, J.) begins with an observation that could define many employment discrimination cases: "an at-will employee meeting one boss' expectations must understand a new boss may not be satisfied with the same old performance." With an opening sentence like that, it should not be a surprise that the court found there to be no evidence of discrimination or retaliation—but the journey through the facts alleged makes the case worthy of note.
Plaintiff Is Promoted Many Times
Daina Cameron-Satchell was hired as a receptionist in 2013 by CHDA, a children's dental services business. She was promoted numerous times, ultimately rising to become one of three regional managers in 2016. After CHDA was sold to a private equity firm in late 2016, new senior management was installed—including a new president (Michael O'Donnell) and an integrations manager (Julie Amos).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Best Practices for Conducting Workplace Investigations: A Legal and HR Perspective
9 minute read
The Intersection of Labor Law and Politics Following the Presidential Election
8 minute read
Sanctioned Penn Law Professor Amy Wax Sues University, Alleging Discrimination
5 minute read
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
