As many personal injury practitioners are no doubt aware, the landmark Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision, Tincher v. Omega Flex, 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014) marked a seismic shift in this state's products liability law. Tincher overruled the seminal Azzarello v. Black Bros., 391 A.2d 1020 (Pa. 1978) decision, instituted two new standards for proving a product defect—risk-utility and consumer expectations—and cast doubt on four decades of evidentiary rulings stemming from the prior Azzarello regime. Despite recognizing the far-reaching impact of its holdings, the Tincher court declined to offer guidance on these now-unsettled, "subsidiary issues," instead inviting "targeted advocacy" in appropriate future cases.