Preventative Medicine Is the Best Kind: Preparing for 2022 Now
But the time saved commuting and communing has given me the opportunity to slow down a bit and observe some trends in my practice. One of these trends reflects a phrase that I often find myself repeating: "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure."
November 30, 2021 at 12:53 PM
7 minute read
It's the season of gratitude and celebration, gratitude and celebration for getting through all this so far. (You know what "this" is!) Like a lot of you, I am still working remotely. I miss my walk to work, the office kibbitzing, lunches, the in-person bar committee meetings. But the time saved commuting and communing has given me the opportunity to slow down a bit and observe some trends in my practice. One of these trends reflects a phrase that I often find myself repeating: "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." So this year, my annual "New Year's Resolutions" column is focused on prevention, rather than curing. I realize it's a bit early for New Years—but it's never too soon to start fresh!
Along with the benefits of remote work are the technology risks that come with it. Comment 8 to Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1, describes familiarity with "the benefits and risks of relevant technology" as a component of maintaining the "requisite knowledge and skill" to comply with your duty of competency. In today's world, that now means preventing cyberattacks. Cyberattacks are becoming prevalent for big and small firms alike, but you can take steps to prevent them. The most important step is training. Train your staff on the prevalence of phishing emails and the danger of opening pdfs and clicking on links. Also, make sure that every attorney with a laptop can connect to wireless through VPN security. Just weeks ago, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided Commonwealth v. Dunkins, 2021 Pa. LEXIS 3994, *14, which held that a student who consents to the terms of use of the Moravian College WiFi network "cannot … have any expectation of privacy with regard to any data … created or stored on computers within or connected to the institution's network." How this holding can be extended to a lawyer's use of WiFi at a coffeeshop, on a train, or in another firm's conference room, is now in question. Connecting through VPN software is an easy and practical answer to avoiding this very consequential risk.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Importance of Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and Its Impact on Privilege
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firms Innovator Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
- 2Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger
- 3'No Retributive Actions,' Kash Patel Pledges if Confirmed to FBI
- 4Justice Department Sues to Block $14 Billion Juniper Buyout by Hewlett Packard Enterprise
- 5A Texas Lawyer Just Rose to the Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250