Creative Uses of the International Entrepreneur Parole Program
Due to various political and legal reasons, the IEP program was suspended before its proposed effective date and had been on hiatus until it was eventually reinstated by the Biden administration in June 2021.
January 26, 2022 at 12:03 PM
8 minute read
In January 2017, the Obama administration, in its waning days, introduced the International Entrepreneur Parole (IEP) program, which would allow the Department of Homeland Security to exercise its parole authority and grant a temporary stay period to entrepreneurial foreign nationals who are coming to the United States to develop promising startup businesses that have strong economic and job-creation potential. The proposed rule initially excited many in the startup community, but their elation was short-lived. Due to various political and legal reasons, the IEP program was suspended before its proposed effective date and had been on hiatus until it was eventually reinstated by the Biden administration in June 2021.
In summary, an applicant of the IEP program will be paroled into the United States for an initial period of up to 30 months. During this period, the applicant will be allowed to apply for work authorization and work for their startup business. The spouse and children of the applicant may also be eligible for parole, and the spouse can apply for work authorization in the United States. To qualify for the initial 30-month parole, the applicant must have substantial ownership (10%) in a startup entity that was created in the United States within the past five years and must play an active role in the business. Further, the startup business must have secured at least $250,000 from one or more qualified investors, or at least $100,000 through one or more qualified government awards or grants. To qualify for a 30-month extension, the applicant will have to show that he continues to maintain substantial ownership (5%), play a central role in the business, and that the business has received an additional $500,000 qualified funding, created five jobs, or demonstrated rapid growth.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute readThe New Trump Worksite Enforcement Paradigm: Everything You Need to Know
14 minute readEB-5 Rebounds After a Rocky Year: Challenges of 2024 Lay Groundwork for a Booming 2025
Navigating the Business Immigration in a Second Trump Administration
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250