Eckert Seamans Concedes Lack of Informed Consent in Alleged Gaming Conflict-of-Interest Suit
The lawsuit stems from POM's allegations that, during an ongoing dispute over the legality of its gambling devices, Eckert Seamans breached its duty to POM by simultaneously representing Parx Casino, which had been arguing that POM's devices should be outlawed as illegal gambling devices.
January 28, 2022 at 03:28 PM
3 minute read
Facing claims that it breached its loyalty to a gambling device manufacturing client, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott has conceded that it did not get informed consent before it began representing a casino that pushed to have the gaming company's devices outlawed.
The law firm filed a stipulation Thursday in the case, Pace-O-Matic v. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, conceding the informed consent issue and agreeing not to advocate on behalf of any client in a way that would run counter to the interests of Pace-O-Matic (POM), which develops electronic gambling games that operate much like slot machines.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Seven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 2
6 minute read
Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
4 minute read
As Costs and Workloads Mount, Law Departments Turn to Tech and Workflow Overhauls
3 minute read
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 2Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 3Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
- 4Cornell Tech Expands Law, Technology and Entrepreneurship Masters of Law Program to Part Time Format
- 5Divided Eighth Circuit Sides With GE's Timely Removal of Indemnification Action to Federal Court
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
