Should a Fiduciary Tiptoe in the Crypto? Rules and Risks
Most fiduciaries who decide to invest in the class will be best protected by, when appropriate, tiptoeing in the crypto, by investing only a small portion in a diversified portfolio in this class.
February 07, 2022 at 02:54 PM
7 minute read
Over the last few years, my law firm's tax, trusts, and estate practice has seen a significant increase in questions and issues related to cryptocurrencies and nonfungible tokens (NFT). (It is only a matter of time before someone asks about the best way to pass their Metaverse digital land holdings to their children!) While increased tax reporting for crypto is on the horizon, this article focuses on today's most relevant questions of whether cryptocurrencies, NFTs and other digital assets are acceptable assets to be held and invested in by executors and trustees, and some planning steps that should be taken for clients that may want their future fiduciaries to significantly invest in these asset classes.
Tracking and Recording Digital Assets
Before discussing a fiduciary's considerations in investing, there are some practical considerations for estates and trusts holding digital assets, and for planners assisting clients with them. First and foremost, estate planning attorneys need to ensure they have a method of capturing information regarding digital assets from their clients. This could be through questionnaires or through client discussion, and probably should be with both. Advisers and fiduciaries will need to know what digital assets exist, if hosted on an exchange, or if the private keys are held in one or more wallets. The advisor and fiduciary would also need to know which wallet the private keys are held in, and whether it is a hot (connected to the internet) wallet or a cold (held on a device not connected to the internet) wallet. They will also need to know the location of the seedphrase that can be used to regain access to wallets storing digital assets. This is incredibly important, as without the ability to access the wallet the executor or trustee would be unable to transfer the asset. This is dramatically different than a traditional securities account, where there are mechanisms in place to obtain control over the assets without the password. This is a major challenge for planning with digital assets, and planners should discuss this with the client and have a plan in place to ensure the client is able to securely transfer the information to the fiduciary. Another issue is that a meaningful percentage of exchanges and hot wallet providers do not allow trusts to hold title to assets stored on those exchanges. Advisors will need to determine if that applies with clients' digital assets and draft a plan to deal with the issue.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment, May I Fix My GST Mistake? Regulations Offer Guidance on Generation-Skipping Tax Exemption Allocation Relief
9 minute readThe Testamentary Exception Does Not Permit a Decedent to Impliedly Waive a Survivor’s Attorney-Client Privilege
6 minute readPennsylvania Modernizes Trust Administration With New Directed Trust Statute
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250