House Rules, On-Premises Consumption and the Consequences to Retail Licensees
The restrictions placed upon both on-premises dining and consumption of alcoholic beverages by the COVID-19 pandemic have caused many retail licensees to adopt "house rules" whereby the on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is dissuaded by various practices.
February 10, 2022 at 01:13 PM
7 minute read
Food and BeverageShould I stay or should I go? While this popular question may remind most people of the famous 1981 hit by The Clash, for those holding retail liquor licenses this question has harbored newfound uncertainty due to the restrictions upon on-premises consumption brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The restrictions placed upon both on-premises dining and consumption of alcoholic beverages by the COVID-19 pandemic have caused many retail licensees to adopt "house rules" whereby the on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is dissuaded by various practices. One such practice became the basis for a Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (the board) decision whereby the board reinstated a citation issued by the Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement (the bureau) against a retail licensee who maintained a practice of requiring the purchase of food in order to purchase alcohol for on-premises consumption, while not applying the same requirement for off-premises consumption of the same beverage. See Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Enforcement v. Rinku, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (2021) (Rinku). However, before discussing the specifics of the case, it is important to provide context on the term "retail licensee." Retail licensee is commonly used to refer to either an Eating Place Retail Dispenser License (E Licensee) or a Restaurant Liquor License (R Licensee). While both of these licensees serve the primary purpose of providing food to the public, they differ in that an R Licensee may serve liquor, wine and beer products, while an E Licensee may only sell beer or its variants. However, both E and R Licensees are prohibited from selling any single, open container of alcoholic beverage for consumption outside the establishment. An R Licensee may be an elegant up-scale restaurant or a simple corner bar. An E Licensee is typically a corner store or gas station.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Ice Pop,' 'Meta Moon,' 'Blue Raspberry': Tracked Drink Flavor Searches Fail in Privacy Suit
4 minute read3rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250