Employers' DEI Takeaways From the NFL Discrimination Case
Diversity initiatives can help "bridge the gap" between an employer's stated goals for inclusion, but implementing such initiatives requires careful thought and consideration.
March 04, 2022 at 10:09 AM
8 minute read
The Rooney Rule and the Flores Allegations
In 2002, the National Football League designed the Rooney Rule to increase the recruitment of ethnic minorities in head coaching positions, and in 2018, the rule expanded to create additional opportunities for diverse candidates. The rule is an example of affirmative action, even though there is no hiring quota or hiring preference given to minorities, only an interviewing quota. From the beginning, the rule received stark criticism. Many opponents claimed that the rule is a form of reverse race discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Despite the initial criticism, the rule's impact has extended beyond the football field as numerous industries have since adopted their own version of the Rooney Rule in hopes of creating more equitable and diverse professions. In fact, variations of the rule are now in place in some of the best-known companies including Amazon, Facebook and Xerox.
Now, roughly 20 years later, a renewed challenge to the Rooney Rule has risen in the form of a class action lawsuit brought by former Miami Dolphins head coach Brian Flores against the NFL and all 32 of its teams. In the lawsuit, Flores alleges racial discrimination in hiring. Specifically, he claims that the New York Giants and the Denver Broncos conducted "sham interviews" as an act of diversity window dressing. Flores also alleges that "while racial barriers have been eroded in many areas," the NFL "lives in a time of the past" and "remains rife with racism, particularly when it comes to the hiring and retention of Black head coaches, coordinators and general managers. … In fact, the racial discrimination has only been made worse by the NFL's disingenuous commitment to social equity." Flores' lawsuit has since drawn the attention of both employees and employers outside of the professional sporting context, as hierarchical business structures have long faced the predicament of racial imbalance in their higher ranks. While minority employees are typically represented in lower-tier or entry-level jobs, they are often absent in upper-tier or management positions.
Voluntary Affirmative Action Plans and Potential for Blowback
While the NFL teams have denied the allegations, the lawsuit raises important questions about how employers will manage diversity initiatives and hiring practices moving forward. These are particularly sensitive issues in a time when organizations are struggling with a dichotomy. On the one hand, organizations are striving to promote diversity and equity in the workplace. At the same time, companies must manage the risk of reverse race discrimination claims. Recently, there has been a string of high-profile cases against YouTube, Google and Starbucks, where white employees claimed unfavorable treatment. In 2021, a jury issued a $10 million verdict in Duvall v. Novant Health, Civil Action No. 3:19-cv-00624 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2021), when they found the plaintiff's race (white) and sex (male) were motivating factors when the employer terminated his employment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBest Practices for Conducting Workplace Investigations: A Legal and HR Perspective
9 minute readThe Intersection of Labor Law and Politics Following the Presidential Election
8 minute readSanctioned Penn Law Professor Amy Wax Sues University, Alleging Discrimination
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Perkins Coie Hires Anthony Shannon as Chief People Officer
- 2Who Is Nicholas J. Ganjei? His Rise to Top Lawyer
- 3Delaware Supreme Court Names Civil Litigator to Serve as New Chief Disciplinary Counsel
- 4Inside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
- 5Fresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250