Chester County lawyer Samuel C. Stretton. Courtesy photo Ethics Forum: Questions and Answers on Professional Responsibility
I see the Supreme Court rejected a Disciplinary Board recommendation that the attorney be reinstated without argument or a briefing schedule other than a rule to show cause. What is going on?
March 24, 2022 at 01:17 PM
10 minute read
Ethics
Punishing someone for being poor when they have changed and reformed, is just not right.
I see the Supreme Court rejected a Disciplinary Board recommendation that the attorney be reinstated without argument or a briefing schedule other than a rule to show cause. What is going on?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5'You Are Not Alone': 120 Sex Assault Victims Plan to Sue Sean 'Diddy' Combs
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
