Debtors' Limited Financial Ties to US Sufficient to Satisfy Eligibility Requirements Under Section 109
In the face of financial distress, or a creditor exercising its remedies against a company's assets, there are significant benefits to filing a Chapter 11 case under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code regardless of where in the world the debtor company is headquartered or conducts its business.
March 28, 2022 at 11:50 AM
6 minute read
In the face of financial distress, or a creditor exercising its remedies against a company's assets, there are significant benefits to filing a Chapter 11 case under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code regardless of where in the world the debtor company is headquartered or conducts its business. Among these benefits are the worldwide reach of the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. Section 362(a), the ability of management to remain in control of the debtor company during the pendency of the bankruptcy case, and the lack of an insolvency requirement. Accordingly, the eligibility requirements to become a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code are of great interest for distressed foreign companies.
A recent decision of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York reiterates just how minimal the ties to the United States need to be for foreign debtors. In In re JPA No. 111, No. 21-12075, 2022 Bankr. LEXIS 259 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2022), the bankruptcy court denied a motion to dismiss two bankruptcy cases filed by Japanese single-purpose entities, finding that a reversionary interest in retainers deposited with the debtors' U.S. bankruptcy counsel satisfied the requirement that the debtors have "property" in the United States.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'In Re King': One Is Definitely the Loneliest Number When Filing an Involuntary Petition
7 minute readDelaying Rent Payment by Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Facilities in Chapter 11
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Second DCA Greenlights USF Class Certification on COVID-19 College Tuition Refunds
- 235 Years After CT's Affordable Housing Act, Progress Remains a Struggle
- 3Bankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
- 4Reality TV Couple and Pacific Palisades Neighbors Sue City of Los Angeles Over Loss of Homes to Fire
- 5Colgate Faces Class Actions Over ‘Deceptive Marketing’ of Children’s Toothpaste
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250