Successfully Orbiting the Mothership in a Satellite Office
Although the distinctions between practicing law in a firm's primary office or a satellite office are important to think through, a satellite office career can be both gratifying and liberating, with less bureaucracy and politicking than may exist in the firm's principal office.
April 08, 2022 at 12:51 PM
7 minute read
Business of Law Philip Karter shareholder with Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry.
Advice for the New Partner
In the modern world of law firm practice, the proliferation of lawyers working remotely, whether for traditional firms or for the much smaller percentage of virtual or cloud-based firms, may make it seem as if the traditional model of reporting to the office for work every day is a relic of the past. Much has been written over the course of the pandemic about how this new paradigm is here to stay and how the ability to work remotely has become an important component of a firm's recruiting toolkit.
However, for those of us who have spent a significant portion of our careers practicing out of smaller satellite offices of large and midsize firms, the concept of not being within close geographic proximity to the vast majority of one's colleagues is not all that unfamiliar. As satellites are concerned, Sputnik may have captured the world's attention when it was first launched, but in today's legal world, the key consideration facing satellite offices is how they can maintain the attention of the mothership (or perhaps multiple motherships), and how the satellite's lawyers, particularly its junior ones, can navigate a successful career trajectory in what is oftentimes a lower profile environment.
There are many reasons why law firms launch or acquire satellite offices; a fertile market to expand the firm's core competencies (e.g., energy law in Texas, government contracts law in Washington, D.C., agriculture law in the Midwest, etc.) or replicate the success of a specialized practice in a geographic area that is underserved; the attraction of adding valued lawyers and practices located in another city who don't want to relocate, or conversely, retaining valued lawyers who wish to relocate but remain with the firm; or the appeal of being within near proximity to important clients or industry centers, to cite a few examples.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All!['The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results 'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/11/Election-2024-Trump-Watch-Party-767x633.jpg)
'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute read![Settlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions Settlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/11/Philadelphia-James-Byrne-Courthouse-06-767x633.jpg)
Settlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute read![Volunteering for Voter Protection Efforts, Pa. Firms Brace for Contentious Election Volunteering for Voter Protection Efforts, Pa. Firms Brace for Contentious Election](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/11/Reed-Smith-Election-Protection-1-767x633.jpg)
Volunteering for Voter Protection Efforts, Pa. Firms Brace for Contentious Election
5 minute read!['These Things Tend to Go in Cycles': Avg. Partner Comp Hits $1M in Phila. 'These Things Tend to Go in Cycles': Avg. Partner Comp Hits $1M in Phila.](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/10/Philadelphia-Skyline-767x633.jpg)
'These Things Tend to Go in Cycles': Avg. Partner Comp Hits $1M in Phila.
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Thursday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-117
- 4Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 5Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250