![Andrew J. Zeltner of Klasko Immigration Law Partners. Courtesy photo](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2022/04/Andrew-Zeltner-767x633.jpg)
Lengthy Immigration Processing Times Impacting US Competitiveness—Is Help on the Way?
While implementing expedited processing will not solve all of the problems that impact the agency, it is certainly a step in the right direction and a welcome recognition that the current state of affairs is untenable for both employers and employees.
April 13, 2022 at 10:30 AM
5 minute read
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) has recently announced a limited expansion of expedited processing for critical permanent residence categories that are utilized by highly skilled foreign nationals. In addition, USCIS has indicated a commitment to provide faster overall processing times for cases that are not eligible for expedited processing. USCIS has committed to increasing capacity, enhancing its technology framework, and expanding staffing in the hopes of making needed improvements to case-processing times over the next several months. This is a welcome development as the USCIS backlog has surged from 5.7 million applications at the end of FY2019, to approximately 9.5 million cases that currently await review. While the Biden administration did not create the backlog, this announcement is a hopeful sign that the administration will begin to seriously address these issues, as it settles into its second year in office.
When expedited processing will become available is not entirely clear, however, USCIS is expected to open this important door before the end of the government's fiscal year in September. Currently, senior-level executives and managers applying in the EB-1(C) multi-national manager category, along with (for example) key scientists and researchers whose cases fall within the National Interest Waiver category, face prolonged backlogs that can extend to over two years before their cases are adjudicated by USCIS. Once implemented, USCIS will now commit to adjudication within 45 days for an additional government filing fee of $2,500. USCIS is also funded through filing fees and does not rely upon congressional appropriations, thus the additional filing fees should allow the agency the opportunity to raise the revenue required to produce more reasonable processing times.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy? Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/8f/0d/9830864b4091be74cb5ce64e2fce/nick-lowrey-767x633.jpg)
Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?
6 minute read![EB-5 Immigration Investor Program: a Win-Win Program, or Is It? EB-5 Immigration Investor Program: a Win-Win Program, or Is It?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/01/Kyle-Garabedian-767x633.jpg)
![Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business? Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/c6/09/887e18ff42bda2b42ebaaf3e0681/immigration-ice-detention-3-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute read![The New Trump Worksite Enforcement Paradigm: Everything You Need to Know The New Trump Worksite Enforcement Paradigm: Everything You Need to Know](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/04/41/7d4ee3034009b995b2795f6ee611/generations-2-767x633.jpg)
The New Trump Worksite Enforcement Paradigm: Everything You Need to Know
14 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Eagles or Chiefs? At These Law Firms, Super Bowl Sunday Gets Complicated
- 2Former NY City Hall Official Tied to Adams Corruption Probe to Plead Guilty
- 3Wilmer, White & Case, Crowell Among the Latest to Add DC Lateral Partners
- 4Advance Auto Parts Hires GC Who Climbed From Bottom to Top of Lowe's Legal Department
- 5Judge Rules Georgia Railroad Can Seize Land as Landowners Vow to Fight
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250