![Samuel H. Pond managing partner with of Pond Lehocky Giordano. Courtesy photo](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2022/05/Samuel-Pond-767x633.jpg)
Misbehaving Employers, Hot Coffee and the 'Depp–Heard' Case Show What's Wrong With Punitive Damages Today
Punitive damages and other penalties in the legal system need to be wielded with a frequency and severity that make them the deterrent they were intended to be.
July 14, 2022 at 11:46 AM
9 minute read
CommentaryA few days before the jury's verdict in the recent Johnny Depp–Amber Heard defamation trial you might have heard about, our firm received a favorable decision from a Pennsylvania workers' compensation judge in a case you surely didn't hear about. In that case, the judge granted our penalty petition—the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act's equivalent of punitive damages—and awarded our client almost $60,000.
A $60,000 recovery in a client's case may not seem significant to many. But in the workers' compensation realm, a $60,000 penalty award is nothing to sneeze at. The penalty award, along with the ubiquitous "golden arches" of McDonald's that dot our landscape, and the $5 million in punitive damages awarded by the Depp–Heard jury to Depp, got me thinking about the role of punitive damages and other legal penalties. Far too often today, they fail to have the deterrent effect they were designed to have.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![A Message to the Community: Meeting the Moment in 2025 A Message to the Community: Meeting the Moment in 2025](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/cd/23/76b0a8704961932ccc99295b7feb/katayun-jaffari-2-767x633.jpg)
![The Importance of Judicial Elections The Importance of Judicial Elections](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/cd/eb/605bd42e4982b5ccf4b68aa325a2/people-asking-questions-767x633.jpg)
![AI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand? AI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2023/06/Chat-GPT-767x633.jpg)
AI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?
![Neighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next? Neighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4f/93/1388ec7e492cb1f4f5c73fa23380/rollo-dennen-baccare-767x633.jpg)
Neighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How Gibson Dunn Lawyers Helped Assemble the LA FireAid Benefit Concert in 'Extreme' Time Crunch
- 2Lawyer Wears Funny Ears When Criticizing: Still Sued for Defamation
- 3Medical Student's Error Takes Center Stage in High Court 'Agency' Dispute
- 4'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
- 5Lackawanna County Lawyer Fails to Shake Legal Mal Claims Over Sex With Client
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250