It is the present generation's role now to ensure that the changes that pioneer Black and Hispanic attorneys made in the past remain.
As a young attorney who practices in Philadelphia, I am very curious about how members of the Black bar were able to break the old-fashioned prejudice that used to exist years ago among the white lawyers who practiced in Philadelphia? The last 60 years or so have seen major changes in the practice of law including major changes in the diversity of lawyers.Ethics Forum: Questions and Answers on Professional Responsibility
As a young attorney who practices in Philadelphia, I am very curious about how members of the Black bar were able to break the old-fashioned prejudice that used to exist years ago among the white lawyers who practiced in Philadelphia? The last 60 years or so have seen major changes in the practice of law including major changes in the diversity of lawyers.
September 08, 2022 at 12:25 PM
12 minute read
Ethics|
It is the present generation's role now to ensure that the changes that pioneer Black and Hispanic attorneys made in the past remain.
As a young attorney who practices in Philadelphia, I am very curious about how members of the Black bar were able to break the old-fashioned prejudice that used to exist years ago among the white lawyers who practiced in Philadelphia? The last 60 years or so have seen major changes in the practice of law including major changes in the diversity of lawyers.
When this writer began practicing law in the early 1970s, the bar was still fairly much an all-white male bar. There were very few Black and Hispanic attorneys, and female attorneys were still few and far between. There were several persons who made major differences. The first was Raymond Pace Alexander. Alexander became the first Black Pennsylvania Common Pleas Court judge. He passed away in 1974. He almost single-handedly broke the color line. Before, he rented an office in the 1930s in the PSFS Building at 12th and Market Street. No Black attorney or Hispanic attorney was allowed to have an office in Center City. It was an unwritten rule. He initially broke that color line. It was then followed up by attorney Richard Moore's father who then opened an office in the 1960s around 17th and Pine Street. Alexander and his brilliant wife (who had a law degree and a Ph.D. in economics from the Wharton School) helped many young attorneys, gave them hope and employment. This writer was fortunate enough to briefly get to know them in the 1970s.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMatt's Corner: Pa.R.D.E. 217—Obligations of a Formerly Admitted Attorney
2 minute readPa. High Court's Revision of Rule 7.1 Tightens Previous Guidance on Firm Names
6 minute readIf You Are Too 'Busy' to Communicate With Your Client, You Better Think Again
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250