City Council's Reliance on Overlay Zoning District Complicates Development in Phila.
As more overlay zoning districts are established, the city should strike that balance and ensure development isn't stifled by the prevalence of increasingly restrictive and confusingly overlapping regulations.
September 29, 2022 at 11:12 AM
6 minute read
To learn what uses are permitted for properties in the city of Philadelphia, one would start by checking the base zoning district for a given property and cross-reference that zoning designation with the relevant section in the Philadelphia Code. A developer would also need to do a smidge more diligence to learn if the property is subject to one, or more, of the 33 additional overlay zoning districts that apply in combination with Philadelphia's base zoning districts. Overlay zoning districts impose additional requirements, restrictions and conditions, which can complicate development throughout the city.
Overlay zoning districts provide city council an additional tool to tailor zoning regulations to different areas throughout the city when creating an entirely new zoning designation might be unwieldy. The ANC (Airport Noise Compatibility) overlay zoning district, for example, allows the city to craft zoning and land use policy for areas adjacent to the Philadelphia International Airport without painting with such a broad brush that industrial, commercial or even residential zoning districts throughout the rest of the city would be affected by land use decisions relevant only to the airport. Another example exists in the DRC (Delaware River Conservation) overlay zoning district, which prohibits the use of certain advertising signage and new structures along certain nature trails along the Delaware River. The city's purpose for creating this district was to enhance quality of life by protecting the parks and trails on the waterfront.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCommonwealth Court Overturns Zoning Board’s Denial Based on Merger Doctrine and Unnecessary Hardship Questions
9 minute readK&L Gates Sheds Space, but Will Stay in Flagship Pittsburgh Office After Lease Renewal
Commonwealth Court Overturns Award of Damages Assessed Against Landlord on Claims of Unlawful Discrimination
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Ex-Prosecutor’s Trial Ends as Judge Throws Out Her Felony Indictment in Ahmaud Arbery Death Case
- 2Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
- 3Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC
- 4Critical Mass With Law.com's Amanda Bronstad: 700+ Residents Near Ohio Derailment File New Suit, Is the FAA to Blame For Last Month's Air Disasters?
- 5Law Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250