A Pennsylvania appeals court has ruled a now-retired senior judge’s orders on a collection of tax disputes are void because he had been working for the Philadelphia Board of Revision of Taxes when he entered his ruling.

The Commonwealth Court’s Wednesday decisions vacated orders in four separate disputes involving health care company Prospect Crozer LLC. And the appellate court remanded three of the orders to the Delaware Court of Common Pleas to be decided by a newly assigned jurist.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]