Does 'Protz' Deal a 'Life-Threatening Injury' to Trauma Billing Under Pa's Workers' Comp Act?
This article will discuss the nondelegation doctrine and its applicability to both the IRE process and medical billing under the act.
October 04, 2022 at 12:38 PM
8 minute read
CommentaryIn one of the most notorious Pennsylvania workers' compensation decisions in recent memory, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Protz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Derry Area School District), 161 A.3d 827 (Pa. 2017), held that the impairment rating evaluation (IRE) process established by the General Assembly's Act 57 of 1996 was unconstitutional, as it prospectively adopted subsequent editions of the American Medical Association (AMA) Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment without legislative oversight, in violation of the nondelegation doctrine. The General Assembly has since replaced Act 57 with Act 111 in response to Protz. However, the Protz decision calls into question other provisions of the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act (the act). Of particular noteworthiness, the reimbursement rate for emergency trauma care under the act depends on standards promulgated by the American College of Surgeons (ACS). This article will discuss the nondelegation doctrine and its applicability to both the IRE process and medical billing under the act. This article will further propose a legislative change to cure these constitutional concerns.
Commonly known as the "nondelegation doctrine," Article II, Section 1 of the Pennsylvania Constitution exclusively vests the General Assembly with legislative authority, which may not be delegated to any other branch of government or to any other private party. Over time, the strictness of the nondelegation doctrine has relaxed, both federally and in Pennsylvania, enabling the rise of the administrative state. Today, the General Assembly may delegate rulemaking authority to an executive administrative agency, so long as the enabling legislation contains "adequate standards which will guide and restrain the exercise of the delegated administrative functions," much like the "intelligible principle" standard utilized at the federal level. See Gilligan v. Pennsylvania Horse Racing Commission, 422 A.2d 487, 489 (Pa. 1980). However, it remains generally unconstitutional for the General Assembly to delegate legislative authority to a private entity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readSeven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 2
6 minute readWith New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250