Evolving Beyond the Shadow of Motherhood: A Call for New Work Structures
In order to achieve equity, we need to move beyond flexibility as an accommodation to parents and move to an overall structure that is flexible for all employees.
October 09, 2022 at 11:24 AM
9 minute read
There is a well-established concept in the field of law and society that negotiations and other actions of people occur "in the shadow of the law" even when there is no direct legal involvement. Throughout my work in gender equity in the legal profession, I find that all genders function in the "shadow" of motherhood at work—regardless of whether or not they actually have children or ever intend to. Our cultural ideas of motherhood as a feminine, selfless and all-encompassing "calling" and role, is infused in the way that we look at women in the workplace, casts a shadow upon masculinity and fathers in the workplace, and even the experience of those who do not have children. This shadow of motherhood—and all of the expectations and assumptions that come with (or without) it—influences our interactions in the workplace, our organizational structures, and inevitably creates disparate experiences for everyone trying to achieve the mythical "balance" between their work lives and their lives outside of the (sometimes virtual) office. In order to achieve equity, we need to move beyond flexibility as an accommodation to parents and move to an overall structure that is flexible for all employees.
While giving all due respect to the (glacial) progress we've made in dismantling general roles and binaries, our society and workplaces still remain quite gendered. Overt expressions of gender, race, homophobia, and ableism as the basis for disparate policies, treatment, and interactions have largely given way to more subconscious and structural disparities that continue to have a very real effect on people. For example, the experiences of all genders with regard to being (or not being) a parent while working in a professional setting occur in the shadow of an idealized and feminine notion of motherhood. It is well established in countless years of research that professional mothers have to constantly rebut assumptions about their commitment to their career at work and their commitment to motherhood to society, risking inadvertently being "mommy-tracked" if they work reduced hours or take a longer period of time off for care work. Pitfalls of the mommy track include: working part-time with part-time pay but still doing the uncompensated work of a full-time employee to constantly reinforce your commitment to your career; a limitation in promotion opportunity; constantly pretending at work that you don't have a second more-than-full-time job of being a mother in a society with outrageous standards for motherhood and a lack of social support like affordable day care; desperately researching ways to achieve a mythical (and impossible) "work-life-balance;" and a boatload of mom guilt. This shadow of idealized motherhood also influences the way we view parenthood in general and specifically how people and organizations treat fathers. We know that when men become fathers, they benefit from a "fatherhood bump" (increase) in salary and promotion as they are assumed to be extra-committed to their careers so they can be "providers," while also simultaneously risk backlash if they decide to use parental leave offerings, due to outdated cultural norms about masculinity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Does She Do It All?: Tips and Insights for the Rising Female Attorney
7 minute readNavigating the Sandwich Generation: Women in Dual Caregiving Roles and the Power of Planning
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 2African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
- 3Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
- 4Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
- 5Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250