Defective Products and Jurisprudence—Will Pennsylvania Water Down Strict Liability?
Time will tell whether Pennsylvania's jurisprudence stays the course or joins the pack allowing the defense of strict products liability cases to converge with negligence actions, and morph the well-reasoned approach followed in Tincher into a trial based upon proof that the product manufacturer did what others do—a principle rejected years ago.
November 07, 2022 at 12:34 PM
11 minute read
Products LiabilityIf consumers were to ask: "how am I protected against the sale of defectively designed or defectively manufactured products in Pennsylvania?", they would learn that there are a host of legal constructs to incentivize manufacturers and sellers to only market safe products. Yet, every day some consumers suffer injury because of a product's flawed design or defective manufacture. Most of this harm is foreseeable and preventable. It's not that manufacturers (for the most part) plan to injure product users, but rather harm typically occurs because the inherent injury-causing flaw was left unguarded or not detected, or not considered a significant enough risk to motivate the manufacturer to remedy it. When injury occurs, Pennsylvanians have the right to file a lawsuit claiming that their injury was avoidable and due to the marketing of a defective product. Products liability lawsuits are extremely difficult to win. Typically, these cases pit the consumer against a national or international corporate conglomerate that has a team of lawyers ready and willing to take every step necessary to beat down the claim. The legal and factual hurdles a plaintiff faces when he files a products case are daunting. And, while our common law has adopted appropriate standards of care by which jurors gauge a product's safety, and judge whether the injury suffered was caused by a defective product, getting to trial and then fending off the substantial defense evidence offered to refute these claims remains formidable.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOzempic Plaintiffs Push for Marketing Discovery After MDL Judge Imposes Limits
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250