Meet The Legal Intelligencer's New Young Lawyer Editorial Board
The Legal Intelligencer is proud to announce the members of our new Young Lawyer Editorial Board.
November 07, 2022 at 11:00 AM
2 minute read
Young LawyersBy The Legal Intelligencer
The Legal Intelligencer is proud to announce the members of our new Young Lawyer Editorial Board. We received a huge number of applicants and we were impressed with all of them. The group of young lawyers selected come from a variety of active legal backgrounds and we look forward to working with them on highlighting engaging topics that matter to them. We have members from Big Law, midsize and small firms, and an assistant city solicitor for the Philadelphia Law Department. Our goal is to develop a board that's eager to stake out positions and shine a light on the most consequential issues facing young lawyers today. We welcome our new board members and thank them for the crucial voice they bring to The Legal Intelligencer's coverage of the legal industry. Keep an eye out for their first editorial coming in 2023. The Young Lawyer Editorial Board members are: >>Jeremy Abay, Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti >>Adesola Adegbesan, Greenberg Traurig >>Leigh Ann Benson, Cozen O'Connor (chair) >>Raphael Castro, Lundy Law >>Desjenee Davis, Assistant City Solicitor, Philadelphia Law Department >>Kiersty DeGroote, Bochetto & Lentz >>Chintan Desai, Offit Kurman >>Sarah Dooley, Duffy + Fulginiti >>Danielle Dwyer, Duane Morris >>Kyle Garabedian, Kang Haggerty >>Melissa Hazell Davis, Griesing Law >>Jamie Inferrera, Dinsmore & Shohl >>Megan Kelleher, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott >>Anthony Knapp, Post & Schell >>Benjamin Lehman, Pollock Begg >>Monica Matias, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis >>Leslie Minora, Ballard Spahr >>Shane Simon, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr >>David Singh, Conrad O'Brien >>Leah Tedford, Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads >>Zachary Torres-Fowler, Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
From Courtroom to Cradle: Practical Advice for Young Attorneys About Parental Leave
7 minute read
Law Firms Mentioned
- Ballard Spahr
- Pepper Hamilton
- Arnstein Lehr
- Griesing Law LLC
- Pietragallo, Gordon, Alfano, Bosick & Raspanti, Llp
- Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr
- Offit Kurman
- Duane Morris
- Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads
- Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC
- Post & Schell
- Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis
- Conrad O'brien PC
- Dinsmore & Shohl
- Cozen O'Connor
- Greenberg Traurig
Trending Stories
- 1Continuing Consolidation : The Biggest Legal Tech M&As of 2024
- 2FTC Announces HSR Final Rulemaking Impacting Premerger Filings
- 3NJ Cut Down on Open Judgeships in 2024, But Dozens of Vacancies Linger
- 4How to Add PR When You’ve Already Taken an ‘L’
- 5'Be Comfortable Being Uncomfortable': Pearls of Wisdom From 2024 GC Q&As
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
