An Unfocused Immigration Policy Poses Risk to US Tech Industry
While the country relied on its manufacturers to bolster the post-war economy, the global economy has become increasingly digital in the past couple decades. The tech industry relies on skilled and often educated workers to innovate and lead the world in technological innovation.
December 08, 2022 at 11:28 AM
7 minute read
This year, many will engage the age-old holiday tradition of heated political debate with your loved ones. With mathematical certainty, someone will mention immigration. It makes sense that immigration finds itself at the center of so much contentious political discourse. After all, immigration reflects who we are as a country. Our country is built upon the unique and diverse contributions of countless cultures and people. In a more tangible sense, this country is the product of the economic contributions of immigrants. In fact, today, the United States is home to more immigrant workers than any other country on earth. Over the course of the 20th century, the United States built itself into an economic world power, largely reliant upon immigrant workers. The country now seeks to maintain its status as an economic leader, but immigration reform poses significant barriers to economic progress. With news of economic downturn, the real-world impact of American immigration policy is in the spotlight.
Our country has a complicated history with immigration. For the vast majority of its history, the United States maintained an open immigration policy with few restrictions. In these early years, immigration was primarily driven by Europeans, seeking freedom from religious and political persecution and economic opportunity. With Europeans came the forced immigration of hundreds of thousands of enslaved persons. In the mid-19th century, economic conditions began to shift in the United States. Initially, the California Gold Rush, which took place around 1848 to 1855, ushered in the first significant wave of Chinese immigrants to the West Coast. As westward expansion gave way to industrialization throughout the country, a new wave of immigrants began arriving from Southern and Eastern Europe. Suddenly, a new wave of immigrant laborers sought to achieve the same American dream chased by settlers just a century prior.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVisa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?
6 minute readLawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Connecticut Movers: New Laterals, Expanding Teams
- 2Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 3AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
- 4One Court’s Opinion on Successfully Bankruptcy Proofing a Borrower
- 5Making the Case for Workflow Automation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250