Christopher Carusone of Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman. Courtesy photo Pennsylvania Investigative Grand Juries Proposed Rule Changes
On Nov. 26, 2022, the Pennsylvania criminal procedural rules committee published proposed changes to the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure predicated on the task force's recommendations and recent case law.
January 24, 2023 at 12:08 PM
6 minute read
In July 2017, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court created the Investigating Grand Jury Task Force to review how statewide and county investigating grand juries operate in Pennsylvania. In November 2019, the task force published a comprehensive report and set of recommendations to better define the roles of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, supervising judge, and the prosecutor in investigative grand jury matters. These recommendations also included proposals for improving grand jury secrecy, eliminating (or better regulating) grand jury reports, and allowing local district attorneys to create regional investigating grand juries. On Nov. 26, 2022, the Pennsylvania criminal procedural rules committee published proposed changes to the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure predicated on the task force's recommendations and recent case law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Disjunctive 'Severe or Pervasive' Standard Applies to Discrimination Claims Against University, Judge Rules
5 minute read
Delivery Driver's Slip-and-Fall Suit Slides Forward Against Equipment Rental Company
4 minute read
Judge Awards $200K in Attorney Fees Following $80K Employment Discrimination Award
4 minute read
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1A&O Shearman Corporate Partner Heads to Jones Day
- 2Funding Rebound: The Top 2024 Legal Tech Investments
- 3Presidential Pardons: A Tool That Can be Used to Move Forward
- 4Some of 2024's Most Notable GC Moves Were Drenched in Drama
- 5Will 2025 Bring a Change to Lawyers' Mandatory Pro Bono Duties Under 'Madden'?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
