Preparing for the Quantum Leap: IP Protection for Quantum Information Systems
This article summarizes recent history and current trends in the QIS patent landscape, explains some of the challenges and opportunities for prosecuting patent applications directed to quantum technologies, and makes a case for trade secret protection as a potentially attractive alternative to patents in this unique area of innovation.
March 02, 2023 at 11:55 AM
10 minute read
Unless you have been living under a proverbial rock, by this point you have heard about ChatGPT, Microsoft's Bing's new AI-powered search tool (aka Sydney), and other forms of "generative" AI (machine learning that generates new content from loads and loads of old content—a copyright lawyer's nightmare). NFTs (nonfungible tokens that reside on the blockchain—a trademark lawyer's nightmare) are also now familiar, especially in light of the trial win for Hermès in the Birkin Bag lawsuit. But these are only two of the emerging technologies that all of us (especially IP lawyers) need to know about. Today, we introduce: quantum computing, and its parent, quantum information science. Yes, just when you thought technology couldn't get more confusing, it has!
The basic premise that computers boil down to ones and zeros will sound familiar to even the least tech-savvy among us. Diving deeper, each digit (or bit) in this binary language traces to its own transistor, or gate in a computer's hardware. Millions of gates in each CPU cooperate to execute commands written in binary code. While innovations in material science and hardware engineering have steadily advanced classical computing by cramming more gates into each processor, the earliest supercomputers of the 1960s and their most powerful modern counterparts all suffer the same binary limitation: each gate is simply open, or closed. Quantum information science (QIS) is dedicated to moving beyond this limitation, harnessing quantum physical phenomena like "superposition" and "entanglement" to build gates that can be more than just open or closed, and can thus support spectacular increases in processing speed over classical processors. Able to perform calculations and solve problems previously thought unsolvable, quantum processing represents a dire threat to the cryptographic and other cybersecurity infrastructures presently relied upon to guard sensitive data and valuable data around the world. After highlighting key public initiatives to advance and prepare for quantum technologies, this article summarizes recent history and current trends in the QIS patent landscape, explains some of the challenges and opportunities for prosecuting patent applications directed to quantum technologies, and makes a case for trade secret protection as a potentially attractive alternative to patents in this unique area of innovation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Taking the Best' of Both Firms, Ballard Spahr and Lane Powell Officially Merge
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DOT Nominee Duffy Pledges Safety, Faster Infrastructure Spending in Confirmation Hearing
- 2'Younger and Invigorated Bench': Biden's Legacy in New Jersey Federal Court
- 3'Every Single Judge on Board': First-Impression Case Revived
- 4NYSBA Annual Meeting: How In-House Counsel Navigate Gen AI Risk
- 5A Judge Ordered Squabbling Lawyers to Have Lunch: Here's What Happened
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250