The Grass Is Greener Where You Water It—How to Address Lawyer Turnover, Retention
Most law firms these days are not struggling to find clients or billable work, but they are struggling to find lawyers capable of doing the work and willing to work the hours to meet client demands.
March 07, 2023 at 12:06 PM
8 minute read
Special Sections"Where did all the associates go?" A rather simple question from a colleague at another law firm the last month while we were discussing the state of affairs in the legal industry. She was sharing a sentiment that I have heard from managing partners and hiring partners from all over the country since mid-2021.
Most law firms these days are not struggling to find clients or billable work, but they are struggling to find lawyers capable of doing the work and willing to work the hours to meet client demands. Unemployment rates in the legal industry are hovering around 1.5%. It is a fact that the legal talent is aging and as it ages, the senior lawyers are looking to work fewer hours—not more. Client demands are increasing, yet the available labor pool is not growing sufficiently to meet these needs. One managing partner told me that they have come to accept that this is the new reality for law firms and that it is not going to change any time soon. Many firms simply cannot find qualified lawyers nor keep the talent they have. Because of this two-headed problem, small and midsized firms are considering joining larger firms to address and solve their talent retention/attraction problem.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the legal industry is expected to grow by 10% in the next 10 years, which is double the expected rate of growth in other industries. So, it is a good time to be a lawyer and it is a good time to be a production lawyer because most firms are looking for talented production attorneys to help solve workflow problems. It should come as no surprise then, that turnover rates generally, and for associates in particular, have increased significantly since 2020. Thomson Reuters reports in its 2022 Report on the State of the Legal Market that associate turnover is approaching 25% and that firms can expect to have more than a 100% turnover in their associate ranks in five years. That is more than double the turnover rate prior to the pandemic.
In the face of a very tight labor market and strong demand for legal services most firms are offering more money to production lawyers to entice them to switch teams. Any number of industry publications cite the desire to get paid more money as the top reason lawyers are increasingly "voting with their feet" and moving to other firms. However, if most firms are paying more money to production lawyers and turnover is still increasing, this lawyer concludes that paying more money to production lawyers may bring them in but is not calculated to enhance retention. It would seem that the old saying that "money can't buy love" is true in the legal industry as well.
A 2022 Thomson Reuters study found that compensation ranked as the fifth most important factor by lawyers who chose not to move to a new firm. Instead, the first four reasons given to "pass on the money" was the environment of the firm, the relationship with their co-workers, the opportunity and support for their advancement, and the firm's genuine regard for their well-being. This survey supports the view that paying more for a lawyer might help get them in the door, but payment of more money alone is not a good retention strategy or is it good for the firms' bottom lines.
The current labor market reminds me of the board game—the Game of Life. In this game, which is essentially a timeline of your life, each player has to make decisions about which path to pursue and each path has a series of milestones impacting family, career and ultimately the ability to win the board game. Making decisions about what firm to join requires lawyers to think about many factors—compensation being but one of them. There are several other factors to consider in deciding which path will lead a lawyer to long-term success and happiness.
Since the end of 2020, too many lawyers are opting to ignore those factors in this labor market and singularly focus on more money. This focus will undoubtedly lead to more turnover. Early in my career, I had a "job" where I was truly unhappy—not with my pay but with the people with whom I worked, and to a lesser extent, the work that I was doing. Thankfully, I quickly came to the conclusion that the firm could not pay me enough to be unhappy. So I found a firm and position where I enjoyed interacting with co-workers, the work I was assigned, and I found an environment supportive of my desire to grow as a lawyer and as a rainmaker. Choosing something in addition to compensation early in my professional career (in my Game of Life) made all the difference for me.
Law firms and their leaders need to look inward and decide what they can do to address the many factors forward-thinking lawyers will consider when deciding to join a new firm or remain where they are. It is clear that today's lawyers want more flexibility about where they work from and when they get their work done. They also want and expect their firms to help them grow and develop business. These wants require law firms to be adaptable and to invest in training and education programs for their lawyers, or risk losing them to competitors. That said, this is not a one-way street. In order to materially grow a book of business, lawyers must be willing to leverage their client relationships by letting other lawyers provide legal services to their clients. This requires lawyers to get to know one other, and to learn each other's strengths to better enable these lawyers to trust one another with their valuable client relationships. Getting to know other professionals requires more than a phone call or a video call. It requires face time, working in an office setting (at times) and by attending social and marketing events with peers. In-person meetings with colleagues (and clients) is a crucial component to a law firm's long-term success at both growth and talent retention. This requires a commitment from lawyers and the law firm. The law firm provides a platform, support, and training opportunities (for both client growth and leadership development) as well as an office environment where lawyers can meet and work together. At the same time, law firms must provide flexibility for the lawyers to find their own work-life balance. The lawyers need to engage with and take advantage of these programs and opportunities. There is another old saying that is applicable here—"if you are not meeting the needs of your customer, someone else will."
Having the right talent in your firm will keep lawyers and clients (both sets of a firm's customers) happy and loyal. There is a pretty simple growth model for success—find good lawyers serving the firm's marketplace and who want to grow their business. All lawyers (and clients) want to work with lawyers doing good work, delivered on time, on budget, and are engaged in the client-attorney relationship.
Recently, I was speaking with an associate at Offit Kurman who decided to remain with the firm despite getting an offer with a higher base pay plan. When I asked her why she decided to stay, she told me she does not think that the grass will always be greener at another firm but rather that the grass will be greener where you water it. She went on to highlight all of the resources and programs that Offit Kurman offers to her, and other lawyers, to help them grow. This was where she focused her internal debate on whether to stay or go. She ultimately decided to remain with a firm focused on making its grass greener for her. Will those other associates who are chasing the "greener" grass do this level of internal debate? Perhaps not. But, firm created training, firm culture, and growth training, will surely be weighed heavily by those forward-looking attorneys at decision time in the Game of Life.
Timothy Lynch is the president of Offit Kurman. As such, he is heavily involved in the daily operations and strategic planning for the firm. Lynch also takes lead on many of the growth initiatives at the firm. He has a national practice that focuses on acting as general counsel and special litigation counsel for entrepreneurs as well as owner-managed businesses and their owners in a wide array of industries. In that regard, he regularly advises clients on strategic, growth and corporate issues. Contact him at [email protected] or 410-209-6436.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpecial Section: 2024 Labor & Employment/Workers' Compensation
Insurers Are Misusing IMEs to Prematurely Cut Off Injured Workers' Benefits
7 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readMembership Has Its Privileges: Bankruptcy Court Examines LLC's Authority to File Bankruptcy
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250