Questions remained following Pennsylvania Supreme Court oral arguments Wednesday, with the justices looking to answer whether defendant Husqvarna Professional Products’ ties to Philadelphia County were sufficient to make transfer of venue from Bucks County proper.

Arguments in Hangey v. Husqvarna Professional Products centered on which factors courts should look at to determine whether a defendant regularly conducts business in a county. In March 2021, the Pennsylvania Superior Court en banc voted 7-2 to reach the same result in the plaintiff’s favor as did the original divided three-judge panel—reversing an order from the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas transferring the case to suburban Bucks County.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]