Mistakes Law Firms Make in Times of Uncertainty—and Four Countermeasures
Effective leaders and successful law firms of the future will learn to embrace change, reject perfection and accept the vague.
March 21, 2023 at 11:52 AM
10 minute read
Smart Strategy
The verdict is in: the party is over. The soaring revenue and profits of 2021 are a distant memory. As law firms glide back to earth, an interesting phenomenon is taking hold: fear. The pressures and anxiety of living through three years of unprecedented uncertainty, volatility and near-constant change has left law firm leaders spent—and highly skeptical. Despite economic indicators predicting reduced inflation, slow growth (note, not a decline) and a muted but still active transactional market, many law firms are behaving the way they often do—protecting short-term profits at the expense of long-term prosperity.
This myopic thinking, however, is not the only miscalculation leaders adopt in times of uncertainty. Several wayward tendencies threaten to set law firms back as leaders grapple with how to guide their businesses through uneven times. More importantly, ambiguity is likely to become the norm rather than the exception for decades to come. Effective leaders and successful law firms of the future will learn to embrace change, reject perfection and accept the vague. They will learn to identify and anticipate the following common mistakes and then take action to remap how they approach the world.
They Stop Spending
It is tale as old as time. Profits per equity partner climbed 19% in 2021 on the back of pent-up demand and depressed expenses. Law firms roared into 2022 with high expectations, then contended with significant compensation hikes followed by tempering demand. By year end, at least according to Wells Fargo figures, law firms fared well. Revenue in 2022 exceeded 2021 by 3% and profits per equity partner dipped just 3.9% from the prior year—an expected trajectory given the leap in 2021 was propelled more by market forces than strategic wizardry on the part of law firms. And this is where the disco ball stops spinning.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?
Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
6 minute readMontgomery McCracken Touts 'Record' Financial Performance Despite Shrinking Head Count
6 minute readCohen Seglias Leader Discusses Growing From Construction Practice into Full-Service Law Firm
Trending Stories
- 1A.I. Depositions: Court Reporters Are Watching Texas Case
- 2Second DCA Greenlights USF Class Certification on COVID-19 College Tuition Refunds
- 335 Years After CT's Affordable Housing Act, Progress Remains a Struggle
- 4Bankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
- 5Reality TV Couple and Pacific Palisades Neighbors Sue City of Los Angeles Over Loss of Homes to Fire
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250